). To me, I am respecting them as actors. For me, the actor comes first. And the star, I don't care." Then arrives the caveat: "Though I must also say, in the same breath, that if I am making an expensive film like
, it helps to have stars. Because it helps that film to sell, people want to go and see that film. So it is great to have stars, who are actors." While the need to cast familiar performers based on affection and respect is understandable, miscasting seems inevitable. "No. See, my film comes first. I never would miscast, to the best of my ability. But, I don't know..." he pauses, frowning, visibly contemplating the issue. "I don't think I would do that. I don't think," he continues, stressing the 'think's, "I would take an actor who doesn't fit the role just because I like him. In that situation, I will test that actor. I'll keep that actor and only cast him when he fits that role." "Like in
, Jackie has grown a beard for his role. Sanjay Dutt has chopped his hair off. So if the actor is committed, and he's a good actor, he can transform himself." "Saif started his growth with
. I didn't want to cast him in
, thought he was a very average actor. He fought with me, he got into that film and I was so impressed. He was not supposed to be in
. I never thought he could handle the role of Harshvardhan, never! Not in my wildest imagination. I was thinking someone more like Hrithik (Roshan) could handle it. But then when Saif did
'I wrote Parinda with Bachchan in mind, instead of Jackie Shroff'
"Cinema has taken away my eyes," Vinod says with a deep, weary sigh -- all the more striking coming from behind his everpresent mirror-sunglasses. His once voracious appetite for all kinds of cinema has now whittled down almost completely. Never one for the Bollywood regulars, his last viewed films were
Black and
Lagaan. There isn't must international cinema he enjoys either, as is evident from his keen dissection of
The Departed. "And not because I wouldn't want to -- I would want to, if there's something worth seeing, I will see it. But it's very rare now." There are actors, and there are actors, and then there's Amitabh Bachchan. The new film is a dream come true simply because Chopra's finally gotten to direct him."It's been 30 years now. He loved my student film
Murder At Monkey Hill, and simply asked me, 'So when do we work together?' I couldn't believe my luck. I had just been nominated for an Oscar (his 1978 film,
An Encounter With Faces, nominated as Best Documentary, Short Subject) and India's biggest actor wanted to work with me!" he punches the air in grinning exultation. "I'd arrived, man!" "But things never quite worked out. He went on to do different kinds of films, and films I wrote with him in mind never mapped out like planned. I wrote
Parinda with Bachchan in mind, instead of Jackie Shroff. And then
Mission Kashmir was written with Bachchan and Shah Rukh Khan in mind, but when it didn't happen, Sanjay Dutt came in and agreed to play Hrithik's dad! He's got awesome commitment. He's shaved his head off for
Eklavya, and if you compare that to Munna Bhai's longish hair, it's a drastic change in look. Sanjay looks phenomenal in this film." While writing, Vinod prefers to keep an actor in mind. This must necessitate great readjustment when the casting call changes, at the last minute. "Yes, but that happens all the time. In
Eklavya, I wasn't convinced about Boman. I wanted Naseeruddin Shah to play the king," he reveals. Never one for diplomacy, the man Naseer's character (Vinod Chopra) in the iconic
Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro was named after, continues. "Naseer has problems working with Bachchan and other actors. And the king's part has an interesting twist, which is why Boman worked so well for it. I wanted Aishwarya Rai to play the Nandini character, which finally went to Raima Sen. I thought she'd be interesting in the role of a mentally fragile girl. But then she wanted the lead role instead. That's the trouble with stars, right?" he grins.
"Even Jimmy's (Shergill) role was initially earmarked for Arshad Warsi -- largely because I had been seeing so much of him during the Munna Bhai films -- but then the character needed to be a good looking, young aristocrat, so Jimmy had to rise to the challenge."

|
'I want Eklavya to give audiences the meaning of right and wrong'
So how was the 30-year dream? Did working with Amitabh meet expectations, of both parties? "No." "It was much, much worse. For both of us, the first three days was a nightmare. I didn't know what would happen to
Eklavya. He was coming in late, things were chaotic, we yelled at each other," he looks frustrated for a moment as he lapses internally to that time. "I think after those three days he realised that I was like a kid, and that my tantrums needed to be indulged. After that, it was much better than we could have dreamed." "I think, while making
Eklavya, I have discovered an actor of such exceptional talent in Mr Bachchan. Very rarely is he pushed to actually deliver roles that demand so much of him. And here he's incredible. You have to see
Eklavya and you will realise the nuances of his character." And there isn't much else he's saying about
Eklavya. Like in
Lage Raho Munna Bhai, where he slyly hid Mahatma Gandhi from us all, this one doesn't have any pre-release overkill. There are even people who think it is the chapter of the same name, from the
Mahabharata. "Let them. That's the best part, let them be completely surprised. I am not concerned what they enter the theatre with, but let them leave with my message. The message of
dharma." "Like
Lage Raho gave them Gandhigiri, I want
Eklavya to give them the meaning of right and wrong." An extremely tall order? Sure.
But as I look at my reflection in his sunglasses, I realise this man -- who gave the Mumbai underworld a glossary of terms with his Parinda and who miraculously composed the background score for Eklavya months before starting the shoot -- with the disarming smile, may just pull it off.
https://specials.rediff.com/movies/2007/feb/15slide1.htm
1