Nuanced narratives ARE OUT for now - Page 3

Do people even look at numbers? This marginalized community left narrative is so embarrassing. Islam has gone from 9.8% of India's total population in 1947 to 18%. Marginalized communities don't double in size in just 70 years. From Bollywood stars to cricketers to Businessmen to President's. Stop the BS.

PEW research centre predicts Islam to almost double again in the next 40 years. Nobody is being marginalized. Look at some numbers instead of following far left twitter accounts.

I think we need to consider the context when looking at absolute numbers. A population increase doesn’t necessarily mean a community is thriving, in fact, it’s often the opposite. Higher birth rates are usually linked to lower education and income levels rather than religion. Just compare Pakistan, where population growth is high, to Turkey, where it's much lower. In states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu, where access to education and healthcare is better, birth rates are the same across all religious groups. Besides, you don’t need to listen to the left to see what’s happening in India, it’s pretty clear if you just look at the facts.

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/india-muslims-marginalized-population-bjp-modi

Originally posted by: FatalFlaw

I think we need to consider the context when looking at absolute numbers. A population increase doesn’t necessarily mean a community is thriving, in fact, it’s often the opposite. Higher birth rates are usually linked to lower education and income levels rather than religion. Just compare Pakistan, where population growth is high, to Turkey, where it's much lower. In states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu, where access to education and healthcare is better, birth rates are the same across all religious groups. Besides, you don’t need to listen to the left to see what’s happening in India, it’s pretty clear if you just look at the facts.

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/india-muslims-marginalized-population-bjp-modi

All religious minorities seem to cry persecution in India recently, but the numbers don't support this. PEW which is the only survey I trust, shows that when it comes to wealth indices there is no difference between Hindus & Muslim both having about the same average income and 19% of the communities being in the top wealth quintile. The only notable difference is education where Muslims lag behind with 70% of the community having not completed high school.

Interestingly it's the Sikhs who are disproportionately wealthier than all other religious communities, about 4X more who have also been crying religious persecution recently. SMH!

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/08/23/sidebar-demographic-profiles/

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

This!!!

Neta ke bachhe are getting education in Harvard and Oxford......aapke bachhe are doing bhajan kirtan in front of masjids and Churches.....

The netas who create hatred for a certain community....unke bachhe are hobnobbing with the Sheikhs and Arabs...

Kuchh logon ko dikhta hai ya nahi??

There are many NRIs who have worked many decades with and under Muslims in gulf countries made good money and now own many properties in India they too are showing deshbhakti while continuing to work overseas they preach that we should be patriotic in buying Indian products boycott chinese whereas they themselves buy Chinese products and consume it on asking about why GOI still allows Chinese products they justify that we need to maintain diplomatic and trade relations

https://youtu.be/8BByaJt9y_w?si=pi_4Nwb3z_D_ZayA

This is a real one ☝️

“Bad actors win by reframing definitions”

I have not watched the movie nor have I read in details about Shambhaji and Aurangzeb war. However, we all have known through our history books that Aurangzeb was a ruler who did carry out brutalities , sharp contrast to Akbar who did not. Should they have changed history and shown Aurangzeb as a benevolent leader ? Should say Ashoka be shown as someone who never plundered the Kalingas ?? Should movies show General Dyer never ordered the Jallianwallah massacre?

Originally posted by: TorinoPasta

I have not watched the movie nor have I read in details about Shambhaji and Aurangzeb war. However, we all have known through our history books that Aurangzeb was a ruler who did carry out brutalities , sharp contrast to Akbar who did not. Should they have changed history and shown Aurangzeb as a benevolent leader ? Should say Ashoka be shown as someone who never plundered the Kalingas ?? Should movies show General Dyer never ordered the Jallianwallah massacre?

exactly. they can not alter history. blame the politicians not the movie.

Originally posted by: Haila_tu

All religious minorities seem to cry persecution in India recently, but the numbers don't support this. PEW which is the only survey I trust, shows that when it comes to wealth indices there is no difference between Hindus & Muslim both having about the same average income and 19% of the communities being in the top wealth quintile. The only notable difference is education where Muslims lag behind with 70% of the community having not completed high school.

Interestingly it's the Sikhs who are disproportionately wealthier than all other religious communities, about 4X more who have also been crying religious persecution recently. SMH!

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/08/23/sidebar-demographic-profiles/

Muslims may not opt for higher education but they r skilled workers. Majority of technicians who visit our houses, karigars in clothing industry r muslims.. Even the cab drivers, delivery agents. And contrary to popular belief they earn good money.

About Sikhs, not sure but can it be coz of farming?

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

https://youtu.be/8BByaJt9y_w?si=pi_4Nwb3z_D_ZayA

This is a real one ☝️

“Bad actors win by reframing definitions”

Could Modi & Trump simply understand their political playing field hustle a bit better?