Originally posted by: RoNoSarKar7
None of madhuri's roles are iconic or memorable. And what did u say her role in dtph 😆🤣Karishma had a much better role than her and she easily got overshadowed in that role.
hahk as a film was iconic, but not her role. There is nothing as such special in that role. All she did was just playing herself and hip - shaking dances.
And devdas, again her role was mostly concerned with dances. And if u really want to chandramukhi go and see Vyjayanthimala's portrayal of chandramukhi. You will see the difference. Also, as far as tawaif roles are concerned, none of them are as iconic as Pakeezah and Umrao Jaan.
Lastly, for her acting, see her in hahk and dtph. You will see no difference because its not two characters, its only madhuri herself.
Ridiculous, Madhuri's roles in HAHK and Devdas are some of the most iconic in Bollywood history. Switch out Madhuri in HAHK and the movie would never be this iconic. She often overshadowed her male co stars in the 90s, you don't do that just with dancing. I don't like movies like Beta but it became a blockbuster because of Madhuri.
Comparing her with Katrina who never overshadows anyone and none of her roles are really memorable. Madhuri's acting is far superior, her expressions alone put Katrina's bland acting to shame
0