Originally posted by: return_to_hades
To clarify, I never said Bollywood deteriorated in content. There is no doubt that Bollywood has been producing higher-quality cinema lately. They may not be mega-hits, but there is something lovely about getting a wide range of simple story-driven films.
That being said cinema can be an escapist medium. DDLJ and HAHK are peak escapism. Wafer-thin plots with larger-than-life characters, the whole colorful song and dance sequences - were something. When you look at popularity of Bollywood films in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia - it is largely based on escapism. The song and dance routine appeal to them too because even they have cultural parallels to Indians. Today's content and story-driven cinema don't appeal to people who view cinema as an escapist medium.
It just goes to show that people don't value the opinions of poorer and POC nations as much as white western nations. And to be honest, I perceive the whole western rejection of escapist cinema as ludicrous. Most people are trying too hard to be high brow. There was a whole era of musicals even in the west. What are the differences between something like Sound of Music and Bollywood films? Why does Slumdog Millionaire win an Oscar? Why is Mama Mia still a guilty pleasure? Why is even Spielberg remaking a classic musical?
It often feels that western audiences won't embrace Bollywood escapism when it is Indians just being Indians and reveling in their Indianness - but will lap it up if there is an angle of poverty or overthrowing oppression.
Slumdog millionaire was/is complete trash. Not even worthy of a paan masala award.
20