Reema Lagoo's character in KKHH - Page 7

Originally posted by: Mahisa22

They are, to an extent. They think being girlish makes them 'uncool', which is a sign of immaturity. (Unless those girls are butch lesbians or transgender) And wearing jeans does not make you boyish, girl jeans and boy jeans are different, and the tops and shirts are different for men and women. You can wear trousers and shirts and still look feminine. Anjali came across as someone who was trying TOO HARDDDDDDDD! not to look like a girl. And that makes her an immature brat in my opinion.

wow so judgemental .. girls can wear whatever the f*ck they want and can dress however they want without people judging them on why they are dressed like that or why they are tomboy ..

And again why are girls expected to behave “ girly “ different person different personality and tomboy doesn’t mean they r ‘ immature brats ‘ or have ‘ internalised misogyny ‘

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

It’s true 😆

Like most women with short hair are most probably lesbians

Lol no .. india really have some generalised idea on sexualities 😆

Originally posted by: Stella_001

Lol no .. india really have some generalised idea on sexualities 😆

I’ve never been to India tho 😆

I have New York perspective 😆

Originally posted by: Stella_001

wow so judgemental .. girls can wear whatever the f*ck they want and can dress however they want without people judging them on why they are dressed like that or why they are tomboy ..

And again why are girls expected to behave “ girly “ different person different personality and tomboy doesn’t mean they r ‘ immature brats ‘ or have ‘ internalised misogyny ‘

Yeah they can wear whatever the f*ck they want, and I can say whatever the f*ck I want. Also yes, if you're a cisgender, heterosexual woman and still go that extra mile to appear masculine, then yes you reek of internalized misogyny...

Originally posted by: Mahisa22

Yeah they can wear whatever the f*ck they want, and I can say whatever the f*ck I want. Also yes, if you're a cisgender, heterosexual woman and still go that extra mile to appear masculine, then yes you reek of internalized misogyny...

nah you are just being judgemental and again why is it expected from woman to be girly or feminine and now that’s what I call misogyny

Originally posted by: Stella_001

nah you are just being judgemental and again why is it expected from woman to be girly or feminine and now that’s what I call misogyny

Not being typically "feminine" is really not the same as LOOKING and LITERALLY IMITATING every body language of a man. Any straight man would get turned off by that.

Originally posted by: Mahisa22

Not being typically "feminine" is really not the same as LOOKING and LITERALLY IMITATING every body language of a man. Any straight man would get turned off by that.

@bold so ? Women’s life doesn’t revolve around men .

and really why judge someone for not being feminine and being ‘ manly ‘ ??!

Originally posted by: Stella_001

@bold so ? Women’s life doesn’t revolve around men .

and really why judge someone for not being feminine and being ‘ manly ‘ ??!

Because it shows self-hate and a deaperation to forsake one's own gender and anytging associated with it. As if being female is something to be ashamed of.

Originally posted by: Mahisa22

Because it shows self-hate and a deaperation to forsake one's own gender and anytging associated with it. As if being female is something to be ashamed of.

just cos they have different personalities doesn’t mean they are ashamed of being women

When was Rahul creepy? I don't know why old srk movies are dissed so much here. There are worse movies with worse male characters.

Srk's character did not fall in love with Anjali only for her beauty. He always had feelings for her but he realized his feelings later.

People here don't diss movies that deserve to be dissed like devdas but sweet innocent movies like ddlj, kkhh should be dissed