If incidents like this are all that the Rajput family lawyer has got on Rhea as proof of the 'torture' she subjected Sushant to, then I'm afraid they cant get very far. Brother and sister had a fight because of something the girlfriend accused the sister of and thus she drove a wedge between them? What is the crime in this?
If anything, by disclosing such things, the family lawyer is making Sushant look bad, someone who can so easily fall under the spell of a woman he just met to the extent that he can disbelieve his own sister and stop talking to her. Esp when the accusation Rhea allegedly made is so crazy.
I am at a loss to understand why the lawyer is talking about all this and to a sleazy publication like Pinkvilla after saying in another interview (Republic/ Times now?) that he wouldnt like to get into the details of what Rhea did to break the bond between Sushant and his sister.
Because "Patna's Finest" is way over his head on this one.
In just one interview he's revealed:
a) Sushant's expenses remained about the same pre and post Rhea.
b) The brother sister bond was extremely weak.
c) Forget Manipulative, Rhea is actually a dunce. Conniving & Manipulative people don't work like that, where they would take such a massive risk piting the man they're trying to manipulate against his own sister within 48-72 hrs of meeting them. 99 out of a 100 times Rhea would've been kicked to the curb. If anything Rhea is an impulsive bonehead.
D) Why the Singh's absolutely despise Rhea's guts.
E) Forceful Confinement, Sushant had changed etc was most likely bull crap. The siblings were not on talking terms due to their fight.
Not sure what the game plan is, but everything he said today contradicts everything that the family is trying to portray so far in the media.
0