Originally posted by: MoonOrchid
You took all I wrote and reduced it to Tiger and HIS numbers vs Ranveer and HIS numbers?😆 (you brought Tiger and Baaghi2 in the topic...
so I was replying to that, not sure why you had to take away just that from my reply.... and use who I am a fan of ...as your..'answer')😆
If you read very carefully, I never even denied he did good numbers- I actually mentioned them !...but there's a lot more beyond 'just Tiger' carrying the success of Baaghi 2.. otherwise why all his other movies - Jatt, Student -flopped?
Why the STAR Tiger couldn;t carry those, too?
Or is your answer that Tiger is a Dolph Lundgren/Schwarzenegger of BW and..that's that?
Still..you haven't replied to my question: hand on heart... you really think Tiger could have done a 300 cr movie without Hrithik?
Have fun!
Again, nobody has saved actual shitty ground WOM (not social media bs) movies in today's time unless you are THE Salman Khan. WOM isn't about star power. Getting people in that theatre the first day is star power and giving your movie a platform. The trash products clearly and rightfully have failed.
Hrithik's Mission Kashmir beat the huge Mohabbatein on opening day in a clash by breaking the opening day record at the time. Hrithik brought that crowd in first day. We all know which one was the bigger hit because that movie trended with much better WOM and lifetime collections. Did Hrithik the star fail his movie the first day?! Or the movie couldn't capitalize on the platform he gave it due to its content?
You keep going back to lifetime 300 crore collections of War when my premise was already lifetime collections is about the content of the movie, not star power. On that record-breaking opening day, I am helluva sure Tiger had 35-40% hand there. Hrithik takes the lion's share of 60-65%. Specifically brought Ranveer so it hits close to home in relating apples to apples for ya to see, how the untalented dude in similar contexts got more people to come on an opening day.
7