Taapsee Pannu and Kriti Sanon stand up for their credits! - Page 7

Originally posted by: McGorgeous

Maybe Karthik and Amitabh walked away with all the praises in Luka Chuppi and Badla because they were simply better? Karthik has walked away with praises in all his previous multi-starrer rom coms too

Parineeti used to often get all the footage in her rom coms, despite shorter roles. Deepika and Alia often do too.

I mean there is definitely a problem when Stree is credited as a Rajkumar hit than a Rajkumar and Shraddha hit or Padmavat as a Ranveer hit rather than a Ranveer and Deepika hit.

</div><div>But not here.

Originally posted by: shogun

Didn't Shahid Kapoor get massacred here for wanting credit in Padmavat's success?!😆

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Damn. Some of y'all have an actual issue with women doing anything at all. What exactly is wrong with asking for credit in movies where both of them are equally present on screen as much as their male counterparts? What's the issue? Why is their past record being brought up here? How the hell does that matter when in these two movies their acting has played an equal part in the success? Its so stupid.

And the peeps comparing them with other actresses who apparently never asked for credit but got them anyway and how all that jazz about deserving it, lmao. Who's deciding who gets credit? These media handles? The audience is who that decides and anyone who has watched these two movies know the contribution by both Taapsee and Kriti so THEY DESERVE IT TOO. And hence they are calling these people out. What's y'alls issue with it anyway?

Some of y'all have some deep grown biases against women standing up for literally anything but will support your male superstars with questionable characters in a blink of an eye. Sometimes do shut up

Originally posted by: NeanderthalGirl

Well AFAIK Kriti has been praised a lot for both BKB and LC.. I have seen BKB and I liked Kriti and RKR much more than Ayushman there. And I know some members too who have loved Kriti as Bitti. So she definitely got a lot of credit for BKB. As for LC I am not sure but I read a few articles and member reviews where Kriti has been praised . So what only one or two articles have ignored her contribution.. most articles nowadays are complete BS. As far as i can see she is getting unanimous praise from audiences which she should be happy about.

About Tapsee, well she was good in Pink (thats the only film I have watched of hers) but was overshadowed by Big B and the other girls were as good as her. Badla I have not watched but obviously in a film where you have Big B he will garner the most attention.. its not like people went to watch a "Tapsee Pannu" starrer and not an "Amitabh Bachhan" starrer. So the main thing is she is yet to make her mark.. she is yet to be in a position where people are awed by her and watch films where she stars in. Yes its wrong if she is completely ignored or her contribution in the story of film is ignored by critics and audience .. but is that the case really? Or just that she got credit but less than big b? Coz if its the latter its understandable. Take the example of Piku.. it had Big b but Deepika was credited more than Big b for the film. Why? Coz DP at that point of time had more BO pull than Big B.. and DP's acting in it is still considered her best performance. Tapsee is still not in that position.. so she can't expect this "credit parity" before she proves her mettle.