Manikarnika Director Krish Finally Speaks Out On WHAT WENT WRONG - Page 4

Originally posted by: sonalak123

don't like sonu sud actor at all.why this director was giving so much importance to him that too infront of superstar kangana.few years back srk insulted him so much on kapil sharma s showi

Originally posted by: SriRani

If SRK did that then he lost my respect.

Originally posted by: Justwatching

He's a Telugu director. National award winner and has been awarded highest lifetime achievement award in Telugu

Originally posted by: SriRani

If SRK did that then he lost my respect.

Why ? isnt sonu the same actor who was in happy new year.srk said to him kitni bhi body banalo kya faayda dikhunga toh main or something like hero toh main hi hoon.sonu isn't that good actor.seems he was a friend of director krish thatswhy he was giving him bigger role and kangana didn't like it

Manikarnika Is Kangana's show all the way
DECCAN CHRONICLE. | SUBHASH K JHA
Published Jan 23, 2019, 12:56 am IST
Updated Jan 23, 2019, 10:54 am IST
According to this source, actors such as Atul Kulkarni, Danny Denzongpa have been reduced to props.
Kangana Ranaut
Kangana Ranaut

Mumbai: On Sunday evening, the co-producers of Manikarnika hosted a special screening for handpicked guests. While those invited were generally positive in their response to the film except for one prevalent complaint about the film's length and the over-dominance of the lead actress in the proceedings. An actor whose role has been chopped to almost zilch says, "This has got to be the longest show reel ever made for an Indian actor. It is nearly two and a half hours long and it isn't a fast-flying narrative. The film is weighed down by its own sense of self-importance. Every frame is about only one actor.

According to this source, actors such as Atul Kulkarni, Danny Denzongpa have been reduced to props. "Sonu Sood is not there at all. He has been replaced by Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub and the role is now much smaller than what it was. Atul who plays the important role of Rani Laxmibai's war General is reduced to two scenes. While Nihar Pandya who plays her brother is a blur. According to this source, "Kangana is in almost every frame of the film. All the other characters have been marginalised to a shadowy nothing. To her credit, she powers the plot, holds it together. But it's a one-woman show or more like a show-reel. The source complains about Kangana's dialogue delivery. "She is unable to deliver the historic lines with enough force. But that apart she is adequate as queen of Jhansi. The second half is all by Krish and the first-half is all done by Kangana. The audience can easily tell the difference between the two halves.
Copyright 2015 - 2019 Deccan Chronicle.
Designed, Developed & Maintained By Daksham

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/bollywood/230119/manikarnika-is-kanganas-show-all-the-way.html

I've never heard of actor who is actually scared to leave the screen for a few seconds. Krish would have balanced things and allowed the supporting cast to be more present if he had continued to direct. The main flaw of the film from most reviews is that the balance wasn't there. The problem is that the rest of the cast was actually very good for their roles but have been sidelined for no fault of their own it seems. Kangana was too threatened by the others, particularly Sonu Sood and wanted to distort the historical background because of it by making his character die earlier. Anyway, this is the result. Obviously, it would have been better to keep the other actress' close-ups and all the other things she cut. So, there are two competing visions of directors here.

What Kangana did is nothing new in Bollywood. Actors always interfere in making of the film. But neither the industry or the audience have much problem with it. Yeah, Kangana might be the first woman to do that, if that's what people have an issue with. As for Kangana taking credit as the director, Krish left the film without completing it. Whatever reason it might be, but Kangana did take over the director's seat. So there's nothing wrong if she's credited as the director.

Originally posted by: Luna46

Kangana haters should find a better reason to bash her. What Kangana did is nothing new in Bollywood. Actors always interfere in making of the film. But neither the industry or the audience have much problem with it. Yeah, Kangana might be the first woman to do that, if that's what people have an issue with. As for Kangana taking credit as the director, Krish left the film without completing it. Whatever reason it might be, but Kangana did take over the director's seat. So there's nothing wrong if she's credited as the director.

And why should we believe Krish on what portions he has shot and what not? Of course he's gonna say that the good portions of the film were shot by him, and Kangana did the bad ones. If the producer of the film had found problem in the film then there must be something wrong with it. Kamal Jain is no doodh peeta bachha that he'll get influenced by Kangana. It was his money which was involved. He wouldn't have let a "flop" actress to do whatever she wants just to feed her ego.

People are so much blinded by hate for Kangana, that they don't even want to see the most logical things in front of them.

Devil's Advocate 🤣

I was just looking at his filmography and i was surprised to see that he directed akshays Gabbar is back.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

Devil's Advocate 🤣