Ishaan Khatter & Shahid Kapoor KWK Discussion Thread!!!!! - Page 14

Originally posted by: galaxyfan

Shahid looks really thin. Haven't followed him for a while..is it for a role? He doesn't look well.

The look Karan gave when shahid took off his jacket .😆 What a perv!!!

Originally posted by: SheDevil

Wow!!! How wonderfully Ratan's character was written & look at shahid that he ruined one of the best characters written by SLB ever 😆😆

Shahid who has such a small frame that he cannot play Rajput King, I just wonder how come same Shahid looked massive in Kaminey's racing scene where he raced along with the horses...Thats my buddy is called camera angle.. I was a mass comm student & I know how camera works..

And wasn't it SLB who said Ratan & padamavati are heroes of film & he will not disrespect Indian Rajputs by making them any less significant? Forget Ratan also, what they did to the titular character, Padmavati? A good film is not abt polishing & putting your whole soul in one character. When you take 3 talented actors & promise to deliver an epic saga you need to take care of each character..SLB didn't give any depth to his Ratan & Padmavati..The way he portrayed khilji was also more drago thn Khilji...Batman''s character was not compromised coz of Joker.

SLB was also the one who said it will be the role of lifetime for Shahid..Does this statement implies that Shahid should know that SLB will backstab him..Leave the tinted fandom glasses for a minute & tell me did they not written Ratan's character poorly? But no shshid should have known that his character will be sissy even when at the time of signing him, SLB promised him a wonderful role..And dare he gets pissed coz of this..

Originally posted by: zara321

in slb's eyes it must hav been a great role for shahid, its slb's film so he is gonna think everything in it is gonna be great, he wasn't gonna say to shahid that the role isn't the best but u shud do it anyway, coz slb must hav thought it was a role worth doing

Originally posted by: SheDevil

if the same would have done with Ranveer what would you say?? He was not there for a cameo, he was also happy when he signed..Leave even screentime, it was very clear SLB didn't give 2nd thought about Ratan or Padmavati..He is a director & all but you simply cannot tell an actor at time of signing that it will be an awesome character when you won't even nourish the character properly...And the title itself never portrayed that it isis Khilji saga so what meatier role?

Shahid is not a bad actor but god Ratan was sissy character thanks to SLB & dont say that's how he was in history coz even Khilji was far from truth

PS - I am not & will not bash RS or any other actors coz I know it is not their fault, the whole fault is of SLB..Best characters were definitely written in Sholay..Every director should learn from that movie that how even small roles can become epic characters with good writing & nourishing😳

Originally posted by: TheSupergirl

Padmaavat was all about khilji. Those who say that Shahid missed his chance to prove himself its all bollocks. Shahid has done better films and better roles than Ratan Rajput.

There was nothing to prove. He was given much less screentime, rubbish dialogues and made to look like a sissy who had no brains. Padmavati's role was also bullshit. She had nothing to do except jump in the fire at the climax or deliver dialogues with glassy eyes. Padmaavat was nothing but a display of slb's fondness for RS. This nobody can dare deny.

Somebody also mentioned about Jim Sarbh. I would say Jim Sarbh had a better character sketch than Ratan Rajput. His role was interesting. There was nothing interesting about Ratan Rajput or Rani Padmavati's character. There were both one dimensional.