Originally posted by: angrybread
I was thinking the same ...how come only terrorising west is considered terrorism as opposed to fellow indians 🤔
Why are we talking about the west? well because the show portrayed a Hindu attempting to blow something up in America, that's why, cause the context is kind of relevant to the discussion, don't you think?
But as you can see, the butt-hurt Islamist-sympathising far-left bigots of this forum are not happy with this fact 😆 so out of desperation they are trying to change the topic. "Hindu terrror" as a phenomenon, outside of India, simply doesn't exist, much to their dismay. It is a localised problem, and even within India, when you look at the statistics, terrorist incidents committed by Hindu extremists, as a proportion, are underrepresented.
14