Something off about Rani recently?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

BornHyper

@BornHyper

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: cougarTown

that is being stupid

how is she powerful? she is no deepika/ priyanka..she has nothing of her own in terms of money and finance..what if Aditiya chopra dumps her ass for vaani..after all he has done that earlier to his first wife and is very much capable of doing it again

i dislike when people act this high and powerful when their own money and finances are hardly their own and they are so dependent on someone else..

🤢

@Bold - She acted in quite a few movies and surely she would have some finance of her own. IMO, she should be relatively well off with her own money

Quote

gilmores

@gilmores

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#32

Rani always gives weird and irritating interviews around her films release. Nothing new there.

She has always been arrogant as well, except when she wasn't married to Adi she was obsessed with appearing saintly. I think she has stopped pretending now and is more honest.

As for being powerful, how many women in BW are truly powerful on their own that people would think twice before offending them?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

YehKya?

@GumGum

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#33

She's been like that since she became the unofficial malkin of YRF (2010 onwards). Before it was limited to YRF talents and employees (Ranveer and Anushka called her their MD on their KWK epi), now it's with everyone.

Edited by hantel - 7 years ago

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: Krantikari

Difference is Aish never had anything to be arrogant about. Unless you count her Miss Universe title and beauty as achievements. I don't, cuz she didn't have to work to be endowed with that level of beauty.

Rani worked hard and cultivated her skills as an actress and is ranked as one of the best actresses in Bollywood. It wasn't given to her. She HAS something to be arrogant about. 😛

Ash never had anything to be arrogant about? She is ten times more famous and renowned than Rani ever was. Beauty pageant title isn't her only achievement (duh), she went on to conquer Indian cinema and made her mark there too (it is pertitnent to note that because there are many other beauty pageant winners who disappeared without a trace).

And you think she didn't have to work hard? How strange is that. Her once-upon-a-time arch-rival Sushmita had this to say when media asked how Ash became more successful: "See, people who feel we are rivals need to realise that Ash has lived life on her terms, but that's who she is. I've seen Ash working very hard on the film sets, I can't do it. I don't work more than 8 hours a day."

Rani belongs to showbiz and has grown up in the industry. Aishwarya, OTOH, has not. She had a humble upbringing and had no connection whatsoever to showbiz, and had no formal training in acting to speak of. Yet she made her mark as an actress and has also ensured longevity of her career, whereas Rani fizzled out early.

Quote

YehKya?

@GumGum

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#35

Aish's appearance is cold, that's the perception, not the real her. Contrary to the public perception I believe Aish is empathetic to others around her, won't leave someone who's crying/ having a melt-down type.

Quote

RAJ

@MrChatVsNorway

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#36

Yeah maintained longevity by doing films like sarabjit , jazba etc🤣

Quote

MercurialMedusa

@MercurialMedusa

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#37

There was something off about her from the beginning. Its just that she was in no position back then to show it. Now her position as YRF malkin makes her show her real side without the fear of being boycotted.

Quote

Ardhanarishwara

@Ardhanarishwara

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: Krantikari

Difference is Aish never had anything to be arrogant about. Unless you count her Miss Universe title and beauty as achievements. I don't, cuz she didn't have to work to be endowed with that level of beauty.

Rani worked hard and cultivated her skills as an actress and is ranked as one of the best actresses in Bollywood. It wasn't given to her. She HAS something to be arrogant about. 😛

I dnt agree with a single sentence you said here..Rani may be more successful box-office wise but she is nowhere as popular as Ash..Ash is a Pan-India star like Sridevi..she is a household name and is known everywhere in India, even outside India and is still relevant..okay leave that aside..okay let's forget our like/dislike for Ash..

The only reason I quoted you is I totally failed to understand the logic behind the coloured words.its not only about this context, I have seen similar words directed towards others to dismiss their achievements..so would love a discussion on it.

You say she is not to be applauded for her beauty because she is born with it...Then we should not be appreciating Ranis talent as well because she is born with it... every talent is like that, be it acting chops,singing, dancing,drawing,even beauty n intelligence all these talents are inborn..yes you can polish the skills by training..but inborn talent has to be there for them to excel the field..so if they achieve success by making use of the talent they are blessed with can't they take pride in it... according to your logic no because they are born with it.. according to your logic Kat,sid etc need to be praised more because they are not born with the acting chops and they made it so far just based on their pure hard working only...but do we do so..no na..we always rate natural acting even over method acting..

Rani is blessed with acting chops she polished her skills and achieved success...Same way Aish is blessed with beauty and dancing skill..not all person with stunning face and body can become beauty pageant winner.. beauty pageant is not only about superficial beauty,there is more to it..she worked hard and reached where she is today..And going by your logic Ash is not blessed with acting chops like Rani is..yet she become a pan India film star n was a lead actress for almost a decade and has few commercially and critically acclaimed films in her kitty..for a person like her who is not born with the natural acting chops would have had to work harder than the one like Rani who are blessed with it to reach the same position as them..

So I would say Ash has all the right to be proud of being crowned as a miss world and has even more valid reason to be proud of her acting journey because she made it on her own with sheer hard work n luck (with a natural skill or industry links not being there to back up).

Quote

Krantikari

@Krantikari

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#39

@ People who quoted me above,

I have clearly said why I don't consider Aish's achievements worth being proud of, I'm not sure why I'm being probed further on that. 😕

People can be famous for a lot of reasons, even the Kardashians are famous (and more famous than Aish), does that necessarily make them more successful than Aish? I don't think so.

If you think Aish's beauty and pageant title holder achievements alongside a flop Bollywood career sans any notable work in acting makes her more successful than Rani, then that's your prerogative.

I am not going to argue further. Ciao.

Edited by Krantikari - 7 years ago

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#40

Originally posted by: Krantikari
@ People who quoted me above,

I have clearly said why I don't consider Aish's achievements worth being proud of, I'm not sure why I'm being probed further on that. 😕

People can be famous for a lot of reasons, even the Kardashians are famous (and more famous than Aish), does that necessarily make them more successful than Aish? I don't think so.

If you think Aish's beauty and pageant title holder achievements alongside a flop Bollywood career sans any notable work in acting makes her more successful than Rani, then that's your prerogative.

I am not going to argue further. Ciao.

No, you insinuated that she had nothing to be arrogant about, which is not true. People can be arrogant for many reasons - beauty and fame included. Look around, you'll find plenty of examples. That's what you were being quoted for, not for what you think of her achievements, which is your own prerogrative and carries zero value to me.

If hers is a flop career, I am sure everyone would want to have a flop career. Who doesn't want a flop career for which you get a Padma Shri honour, (which Rani still hasn't btw)? 😃

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Something off about Rani recently? - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics