Posted:
Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest
I believe that you may be overstating the no. of films made for outsiders. Nepotism exists in other movie industries as well and besides those people on the list, we also have movies from successful actors, who are the products of nepotism and aren't on the list. Moreover, star kids get launched by bigger banners, who have more access to funds to reserve more theatres and for promotion as well (add onto this, they have the advantage of promotion by their relatives as well). The scale of the movies differ too. Most newcomers are launched in much small-scale movies, with little promotion. Most small-scale movies, by newcomers are promoted solely by word-of-mouth and their movies only succeed when they are strong word-of-mouth reviews. Most newbies rarely are launched in big banner movies. These are additional barriers that newbie actors have to overcome.
WOM nowadays play most important role, a 90 Lac opening of Newton suddenly turns into 22 Cr Success film just by positive WOM. A 2.50 Cr opening of Hindi Medium becomes HIT with 62 Cr Business.
So if Newcomers films doesn't get WOM, it ain't Starkids fault??? Fact is FILMS are much more in number for OUTSIDER than for INDISERS proves that MONEY is Spent more on Outsider, they couldn't prove their talent so blame on Nepotism.
CID
18