SLB must put better researchers on the job next time!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

1105912

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: blue-ice.
Bilkul galat...Khilji was a barbarian...but SLB turned him into a joker...

😆😆😆

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: Justmoi

BI apparently there were two Khiljis. This Khilji was born in Delhi, the other in Afghanistan. I have no idea of Indian history, what is true ?

ye toh SLB se poochhna padega ki kaun sa wala Khilji hai unki saga mein😆😆

jahan tak history mein padha hua thoda bahut yaad hai..that Khilji was a barbaric , cruel and disgusting man...there is a reason why Rani Padmini chose to give up her life rather than being a prisoner to this disgusting man...

Ab kuchh log kahenge ki Britishers bhi humein cricket de kar gaye hain...toh woh bhi mahan hai😳

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1127278

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: ranikaadi
This is entertainment, if you want history... read a book or watch the history channel.

Quote

SrideviFan4ever

@SrideviFan4ever

Navigator

Posted: 7 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: -Goldendew-
His movie is an interpretation of a poem called "padmavat". Which was a fictional account with few historic places and people mentioned in it. Don't understand why these people are insisting on accuracy? If that was the case padmavati should not be in the story as she was part of folklore not reality.

But the article is about Khilji and Khilji was in real.

Quote

Ume Salma Kakal

@sunflower52

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#25

Khilji was barbaric, cruel in nature but looked & acted a bit civilized, there was no need to make him look like a Mongolian barbarian.

Do not touch historical people if can not do justice to them, there are many ways to show cruelty & barbarism without going OTT.

Quote

rebelheart

@iamrebelheart

Sparkler

+ 4

Fantasy Force

Posted: 7 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: atominis
Khilji was very much a barbarian and no apologist will change it.
Same pseudos were writing articles in defense of Aurangzeb in 2015!🤢

Let them bark all they want!

Our country, our cinema. We are free now. We are not dhimmis that we need to glorify barbaric invaders anywhere in our country be it History books, movies or TV.

Those who loved and idolised invaders already got lost and parted ways in 1947.

Those who still love invaders are free to leave and get citizenship elsewhere.

Agree with each and every word👏

Quote

_InVogue_

@_InVogue_

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#27

If Slb maintains accuracy in details,subtlety and restraint in performances,masses wont come in.Then how will he recover that HUGE ass budget? Ranveer's over dramatic and loud portrayal of Khilji is the main attraction for single screen audience.

Quote

AladdinKaChirag

@AladdinKaChirag

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#28

Y are people so worked up on khilji's looks? And he wasn't a barabrian, really?? This article seems to have been written by some pseudo liberal 😆 Sorry i don't have a problem with a king who was barbaric in nature being shown as one too by appearance, , if he tried to glorify khilji, that would have surely troubled me, i didn't like the potrayal of bajirao's love story too in BM.

Edited by ..PikACHU... - 7 years ago

Quote

Kehkasha

@K.Ahm

Rocker

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#29

I agree that Khilji was cruel, ruthless and barbaric but here the writer is on about the behaviour and the look of the character.
Historically he was well dressed and had the basic manners. Here he looks like someone from the jungle. That isn't accurate.
The movie is portraying him as a villain because he was one but just because he is supposed to be a villain doesn't mean he was ill mannered wore some weird clothes and ate as if he was hungry forever.

Edited by K.Ahm - 7 years ago

Quote

1101831

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: atominis
Khilji was very much a barbarian and no apologist will change it.
Same pseudos were writing articles in defense of Aurangzeb in 2015!🤢

Let them bark all they want!

Our country, our cinema. We are free now. We are not dhimmis that we need to glorify barbaric invaders anywhere in our country be it History books, movies or TV.

Those who loved and idolised invaders already got lost and parted ways in 1947.

Those who still love invaders are free to leave and get citizenship elsewhere.

This author is scared to called Khilji barbaric, if she had read history, then she should know that they were olden day ISIS who believed in killing millions of hindu, destroying temples and forcing them to convert into islam and even raped dead women, and killed them after rape, so women preferred Jauhar. When they departed on 47, they kept their missile name after Barbaric king like Ghaznavi, and Ghauri.

http://www.thetinyman.in/2016/01/mughal-barbarism-islamic-savagery-india.html

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 21

SLB must put better researchers on the job next time! - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics