@Atominis-
1. I understand you believe Hrithik should have been a more thoughtful stalking victim and disagree with how he handled being stalked on email. However it is of little consequence since, as we have discussed several times, the emails were bothersome but not why he went legal/public. It was the public accusations of harassment, stalking, interfering with her ability to work, threats, intimidation, and of course a long term serious relationship with a broken promise of marriage. Kangana has submitted no proof of any of these accusations. Thank goodness Hrithiks forensic IT company was able to recover so many of her one sided emails to him to show her lies.
2 . If he is so powerful, I can't help but wonder why he didn't silence her before she started spouting her lies. Why didn't he use his BW might to get public support while she was gathering headlines as the wronged woman and he was being vilified as a lying, stalking, womanizing coward? Also I'm wondering why the apparent lack of BW support for him previously was used as "evidence" of his guilt.
3. As we have discussed, Kangana was responding to a question which used his specific name when she made the "exes do silly things" comment. No one in the media had any question about who she was talking about, why do you? The first things Hrithik says in the legal notice after the silly ex comment is she is spreading the rumors of a relationship and there is not and never has been a relationship. He was not admitting he was the silly ex. He was acknowledging she had "called" him a silly ex.
4. The truth is out.
Edited by Nova19 - 7 years ago
27