Originally posted by: poetic
Amarendra at some level knew that Devsena was being harassed for being with him, and for not letting Sivagami get the beter of her.
He had promised her that he would always protect her, her dignity. He was literally mad in this scene, but in a restrained way. The way he kept his hand on the sword and looked at her hands in the chain
exactly! one could see his rage burning in his eyes!still I was amazed @ how this guy kept control..
there's one shot just after this where even sivagami looks on worriedly because she was also anticipating an outburst...maybe coz she would also have never seen amarendra this angry!
but sivagami was so unjust here...chaining the pregnant daughter in law of the royal family.like that..whatever she did..that was clear disrespect. .so what if baahubali had no positions ...he IS the son of the erstwhile Maharaja veerendra vikramadeva. .and still worthy heir to the throne...
and which mother would've given such a treatment to the woman who was carrying her son's child and the heir to the royal family?
oh but correction sivagami was NOT his mother right?I forgot .
when it came to devasena. ..it was always EGO that mattered to sivagami 😡
6