WHAT THE f**k - Page 3

This is like two minutes of fame for South industry. They can't let it go.

You may like Baahubali better than Avatar, but maintaining with a straight face that it comes even within light years technically to what Avatar achieved, is delusional. It also shows lack of knowledge about what CGI is and how its done.

Forget Avatar, shows on network TV have CGI that is a gazillion times better than what we have in Baahubali.
The reason for this is of-course is the he vast difference in budget (for HW biggies like Avatar) but also the technical expertise of the programmers, but that point is moot in this discussion.

Some of the shots literally use photoshopped images in the backdrop hoping nobody notices and the epic war scenes are no better that what computer games were doing back in the 90's.

What was so great about Avatar?

I haven't watched Bahubali, but found Avatar to be so so boring!

Originally posted by: Justmoi

Hmm...I must be on something because I thought you liked my post and now it is not there. Pressed the wrong button by mistake.

Tom and Jerry has better graphics, now I know you are on something.

Let me repeat in small words. Cameron needed 3D to show the effect of the leaves his team worked on. He thought that was the future. All these years later, who the hell wears 3D to see those leaves. On the other hand, the temples of Mahismati will be the same today, tomorrow a decade hell even 50 years from now. You can watch it on any medium, your phone, tablet, laptop even on your outdoor projector. It will still look the same. That to me is worth something. That alone makes it superior, plus the budget. So if you are trolling for more, sorry cya !!

Okay, I am genuinely shocked at what I am reading here in the thread. Its like people have a mask on and are refusing to see what put in front of them.

Okay now coming to your posts:

1. You can watch Avatar without 3D on any platform, it still looks amazing. With 3D in Imax though, it is another experience entirely.

2. Baahubali doesn't have world class CGI or effects, not even close. For what world class is see the Harry Potter movies, Marvel and DC stuff, the transformers movies etc. Stuff like Gravity, Avatar, Lord of the Rings or Life of Pi are not just world class, these movies are trendsetters and pioneers in the world of digital film-making.

3. Cameron is having trouble with his new movies because they are damn hard to get right. I would like to see anyone else try and create a full underwater world where characters are as real as on land, the lighting and movement is perfect and doesn't look forced, and on top of that create a fully immersive and believable alien world.

4. There is a difference b/w a movie being better technically and a movie telling a better story. Avatar is a technical masterwork, while the story yes, is generic and not so good. The two are not the same thing.

Finally everyone see this for just how hard it is to get this stuff right and how incredible movies like Avatar are, for doing so:

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0cPeEAhzWU[/YOUTUBE]

I don't know how anyone who looks at even a poor Hollywood blockbuster and then Baahubali can come to the conclusion that the later is anywhere near the former, let alone stuff like Avatar.

The person is smoking something called opinion sold by the brand personal preferences.

Its called delusion, nice smoke, and hype a great soft drink.

Originally posted by: ZadayKiDaig

This is like two minutes of fame for South industry. They can't let it go.

Sairat was a hit last year and maharashtra people did not start Sairat>sholey kind of topics. But this is hilarious.

@Arsai