against the motion :-
after 12 days finally kaabil was able to overtake raees in collections in India . Celebrating that is equivalent to saying that australia won the world cup 2015 but hey zimbabwe too played the wrold cup.
Some factors also seem to be missing
1) author has not taken in point that majority have already seen raees and hence now kaabil will get more audience naturally and it has got nothing to do with better quality
2)If you compare the footfalls then again it will be proved how much percentage higher is the no, of people watching raees compared to kaabil.
Now you might argue that kaabil had lesser number of screens but blaming that on bahubali is just conjecture . Another case might be that actually distributors could not fathom how a 80s movie could work in modern India and hence allotted lesser number of screens.
But hey whatever keeps your engine running π