| Baahubali | Official Updates & Discussion Thread #13 | - Page 41

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

I agree.. but none of the reasons that we come up with (I've seen other discussions in different social media platforms) seem solid to me.. And SSR himself said that he has not yet seen anyone getting close to the answer..

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

Exactly! they just want to keep the interest going till the movie releases..

1)

Yeah, see if this is the real reason, keeping it as cliffhanger n then all this hype is too much! I understand - it seems reasonable but tooo basic, no? I mean, it doesn't take a genius to figure this one out.. We saw Kattappa in part 1, we know he is loyal to throne.. so what's new in this?

May be the way it all happens is the innovation here😕

2) It depends on what Bhalla did too right? What if Bhalla had gone beyond a point and Baahu had to step in?(Prabhas in recent interview said he was trying to save someone when WKKB). But will Kattappa take this step?

Even so.. Baahu might lose his temper.. but he will never kill Bhalla.. and we have to consider the background too.. its a wild place

3) I know but they are facts too! He does care about both! 😆

Seriously!

Taking the blame seem possible (Bhalla did mention he wants to kill Baahu with his own hands again - did it mean, he didn't get to do that the 1st time? or he wants to do it 2nd time?).. Also I think if Kattappa did take the blame, it was coz of Sivagami too.. they needed Maahishmathi to have a king (so that there won't be attack from other kingdoms), so Kattappa took the blame & defamed Baahu too? (This would explain why Sivagami said she did sin)

Again - too much hype if this was the reason! Unless they can back it up with proper sequences n all.. Also, Kattappa maybe didn't realize till it was too late? n possibly he learned from that 1 time, n so he stopped himself in 2nd time?

Exactly! it all seems so puzzling! There must be a valid reason why she is behaving this way no?

Originally posted by: MeenuCrazyPanda

May be the way it all happens is the innovation here😕

Even so.. Baahu might lose his temper.. but he will never kill Bhalla.. and we have to consider the background too.. its a wild place

3) I know but they are facts too! He does care about both! 😆

Seriously!

Sivagami's sins.. Ahh! SSR has really got us going in rounds.. and he happily says that no one is even near the actual answer... 😡😡

Possible about not repeating the same mistake.. but accident is just too common

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

Innovation? But it's the reason that's creating the hype.. if reason is not good enough, then innovation won't help..

Innovation is the way they narrate the whole sequence yaar

I am not saying Baahu would kill Bhalla, but he would maybe attack him, which might look like he is about to kill him.. u know, from another point of view. Wild place .. yes.. The possibilities of what Bhalla could do there is endless.. was he trying to kill someone? someone innocent? Is that the person Baahu was trying to save? And it also means Kattappa couldn't probably see what was going on there or who was attacking Bhalla..

I am still not so sure.. Baahu is a man of his virtue. He will lose temper and might go to kill Bhalla.. But he wont let it get past his limits.. and I don't think that will give Kattappa enough time to kill him!

Exactly!

I know.. I personally don't think it could be accident, but was just considering different possibilities

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

That's exactly what they want to do with that poster & line! the goosebumps.. the emotions!

I really have a strange feeling about this though..

Did Kattappa really kill Baahubali? If so, why? In part 1 Kattappa regretfully says he's the traitor who killed Baahubali so it must be true. Why ? That's the question we don't have an answer.

1) Because Sivagami/Bhalla (the throne) told him to.. Now that just seems like the reason even a 5 year old would come up with.. I mean, no offense but there is no surprise behind it.. We know he is bound to the throne & will do anything (even if he is against it personally)..Did SSR really think that would be good answer to the cliffhanger that kept the nation talking?? I don't think so (I really hope not)Yeah hope it would something that we would have never imagined.

2) He was tricked by Bhalla/Sivagami into believing that Baahu was a traitor to Maahishmathi.. or that Baahu was attacking Bhalla (who was in throne @ that time) and so in attempt to save the king, he did it.. again.. not an impressive reason if u ask me... Though he is a loyal slave warrior, he knows Baahu personally n would know the real side of him.. Would he go to the extent of killing him even if he was attacking Bhalla/throne? I really don't think so..I don't think so too. Everyone saw how he fought for Mahishmathi and his mother in part 1. He boosted his soldiers morally and got them to fight. Sivagami praised him for saving his people and killing the enemies, framing him as a traitor ? No one would believe. Besides everyone started hailing Baahubali during erection of Bhalla statue, if he was framed as a traitor people wouldn't be adoring him. All love him as their King and look up to him as their God even after his death.

3) Anyone other than these 2 - seem unlikely.. 1)Kattappa listens to throne & 2)he cares for Baahu more than anything..True but what if someone who is so precious to Baahu, her/his life is in danger and the only way to save them is death of Baahu...why wouldn't Kattappa kill him ? Probably at that time he would have thought i'd rather kill Baahu then see him grieve over his dead son and wife who are his everything ??? I know its weird...😕

So what could be the reason? Personal vengeance? Not possible, coz if he was going to do that, he would've killed Bhalla by now.. Bhalla himself said how Kattappa wants to kill him (after the bullfight)..

To kill a baby he raised.. I personally doubt he did it.. It just seem very unlikely..we don't know the drama that will take place in Part 2 but somehow it takes a lot to bring yourself to even punish the kids you raised..especially in a equation as that of Baahu & Kattappa.. so how can one go to the extent of killing?

*Did someone else kill Baahu and Kattappa took the blame? For the better future of Maahishmathi? Possible..

*Was this all an accident? Kattappa intended to kill someone else n Baahu knowingly/unknowingly came in between? If so, who is that person & their equation among these characters?I don't think so it was a case of mistaken identity. Last part showed Baahu fighting with someone while Kattapa attacks him from behind. Being with Baahu and knowing him in and out wouldn't Kattappa be able to make out it is Baahubali ? The height, the stature, the way of fighting.Doesn't seem like an accident. If Baahu came in unknowingly then he would have been stabbed in the front instead of back.

[DIV]*How is Devasena related to all this? I mean, if Kattappa had killed Baahu then why isn't Devasena angry @ him ? Is it only because she understand his helplessness? or is it because she knows something more that others don't know? Yes maybe she knows more than what others don't. Her vengeance is on Bhalla( not even Bijjala ) that means she knows he's the mastermind behind everything. She is accused of being an adultress but she wasn't able to do anything similarly she understood Kattappa was being used by Bhalla, he's also been facing the same plight as her.Same with Sivagami. Initially she must have listened to Bhalla and acted against Baahu but after realizing her blunder she left with baby Mahendra.If Deva has to trust her with her baby inspite of Sivagami playing a part ( directly or indirectly) in her husband's death, she has understood the trap laid on them. Except Bhalla and his dad everyone are basically good but have been victims of circumstances.

In the recent B2 interview with Anupama, she asks D why his hands are all bloody and he replies I have to save someone. That someone could be only Deva( pregnant or with baby). He's fighting with Bhalla's guards and maybe Kattappa begs him to leave Deva and he agrees to that provided Kattappa killed Baahu.As all villains Bhalla doesn't keep up his word and tries to kill the child. Sivagami runs away with him and the rest is history.

Originally posted by: bahubalifan

that was one hell of a prediction @bahubalifan

But what has me going in rounds is Kattappa is not a person to kill Baahu for the life of MAhendra.. He is a person who could have handled the situation very differently saving everyone if possible.. DO you think Deva would spare him if he had killed her husband in return for her life? I don't think so

Originally posted by: ratna.nanda

@ bahubalifan In the recent B2 interview with Anupama, she asks D why his hands are all bloody and he replies I have to save someone. That someone could be only Deva( pregnant or with baby). He's fighting with Bhalla's guards and maybe Kattappa begs him to leave Deva and he agrees to that provided Kattappa killed Baahu.As all villains Bhalla doesn't keep up his word and tries to kill the child. Sivagami runs away with him and the rest is history.

a very possible prediction indeed. couldn't help but reply.but reading this itself makes me cringe at SSR! what a desperate,helpless situation!!nor can we hate kattappa or save baahu :-((.

if this is what they're going to show in part2,the movie loses all rewatch value for me

@ meenu,@ishu I'll reply to other posts soon.very interesting discussion in the thread!after ages!reminds me of our initial days post part1 release.