Ranveer Singh strikes again - Page 2

These articles are mis-targeted. Yes the average urban woman is not only expected to have a good career but also equally good in the kitchen and other household work to be considered "marriage-material'. Deepika doesn't fall in this category though and Ranveer calling her marriage-material is only because of their relationship. He is also not a feminist in any way, what a joke 😆

Originally posted by: ZulekhaKhan

Itna hangama on 'marriage material'... I m sure DP has no problem in being labelled as 'marriage material' thats a part of her image makeover by her PR.. she would like to make us believe that she is very homely unlike veronica 😆.. thats her statement by the way!!


but I wont see such long essays from males if we call a guy 'husband material' or 'marriage material' or 'boyfriend goals' 😆

Girlfriend material,boyfriend material,husband material

I don't think the term "marriage material" has a gender connotation, so I don't consider it sexist.

Didnt read the whole thing. Too long 😆

But talking generally, the hype around this "marriage material" phrase is so useless IMO.
I mean what's wrong in wanting to marry a person with some particular qualities? 😕
Being a girl, I would want to marry a guy with a secure job. Who has a good reputation. Is goodlooking, hardworking, doesnt drink/smoke & many other qualities. That's my definition of a marriage material guy. I know I wont be termed as a sexist. But if a guy wants the same qualities in a woman, he's termed as a sexist. Why? 😕

Its wrong when you are flirting & dating people who actually are opposite to your definition of marriage materials but shaadi toh ke liye toh "sanskaari" hi honi chaahiye 😆 Which is actually the case with many actors. This is exactly what they showed in Cocktail too & it was annoying 😳

But if you've decided in your head that I want to hangout/flirt/date/get married to somebody with this this this particular qualities in him/her, toh phir what's wrong? 😆

if you call a gal marriage material that means she would make a perfect wife/ Mom/ partner

Whats so sexist about it 🤪

The title is offensive though ! 😉

Oh God. This is called creating an issue out of nothing. I am not the biggest Ranveer fan but this article is absolute rubbish. Click-bait anyone?

Let's not make everything women degrading shall we?? let's not turn everything into men vs women, there's nothing wrong in that statement, this person is marriage material goes for both men and women, Ranveer said that about Deepika reasons better known to him, he certainly knows her better than us but in the real world there people who are better doing/handling/managing certain things than others, there are people who are more homely, less commitment phobia than some, settling down is more desirable to some than others, there are many factors that can lead one to believe that someone's marriage material or not and it goes for both men and women, that doesn't mean one shldn't get married cuz they don't seem the kind, one can have every good quality in the book but still only good knows if they wld make better husband/wife than one with limited qualities, it certainly has nothing to do with what the writer mentioned above.

Kuch nahin mila toh yeh??