My son's debut is my priority right now: Sunny Deol

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

d-_-b

@d-_-b

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#21

The one behind Karan looks better. He has a face you would love to punch. Will be good for a douchey character. Is it the second son of Sunny Deol?

Quote

Nikhil

@Nikhil718

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#22

^^

I know looks are first thing people will see even when you meet new people. Sunny's son is far from ugly. IMO, he's far better looking than Tiger Shroff. Tiger was a laughing stock when debuted but now people like him.

Anyways, lets just see what happens after his debut. If other producers as e.g. Sajid Nadiadwala & Karan Johar are willing cast him their films.

Edited by Nikhil92 - 9 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: raj80
"When we came in the industry, there were no teenagers but now it's only teenagers who are encouraged to become actors.

This is not true.

Back then...

Sunny Deol debuted in 1983 aged 26

Sanjay Dutt debuted in 1981 aged 22.

Anil Kapoor debuted in 1979 aged 23.

Jackie Shroff debuted in 1983 aged 25.

Today...

Harshvardhan Kapoor debuts in 2016 aged 26.

Sooraj Pancholi debuted in 2015 aged 25.

Tiger Shroff debuted in 2014 aged 24.

Ranveer Singh debuted in 2010 aged 25.

Ranbir Kapoor debuted in 2007 aged 25.

It was the girls that used to debut aged 16-17 back in the early 90s...

Karisma Kapoor in 1991 (aged 16)

Pooja Bhatt in 1990 (aged 16)

Kajol in 1992 (aged 17)

Raveena Tandon in 1991 (age 17)

Divya Bharti in 1992 (age 17)

Shilpa Shetty in 1993 (age 17)

Urmila Matondkar in 1991 (age 17)

Today they usually debut early 20s...

Deepika Padukone in 2007 (aged 21)

Sonam Kapoor in 2007 (aged 22)

Anushka Sharma in 2008 (aged 20)

Asin in 2008 (aged 23)

Sonakshi Sinha in 2010 (aged 23)

Shraddha Kapoor in 2010 (aged 23)

Parineeti Chopra in 2011 (aged 23)

Illeana D'Cruz in 2012 (aged 25)

Vaani Kapoor in 2013 (aged 25)

Kriti Sanon in 2014 (aged 24)

*Alia Bhatt debuted aged 19 in 2012.

Edited by Rekha_ji - 9 years ago

Quote

931547

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#24

Just let Aditya Chopra do the honours Paaji. Vijayta films isn't what it used to be. He'll look fine with a bit of grooming and maybe a new jawline.

Quote

d2rocks

@d2rocks

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#25

not a hero material... comes out as a shy and reserved personality to me

Quote

crazygul

@crazygul

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: TheBoss
As much as we would like to disagree we can all agree that looks is the first thing you see in a person even before their personality. You will only able to get to know them after you see them. I have no problem judging somebody on their looks if they are celebrity. Looks is a part of the package and they are suppose to be above than average. It is no different then me looking for a qualified mechanic or a doctor or a lawyer. I judge them based on their skills. For an actor although acting is important, looks also is a valuable commodity.

i royally agree with you. looks are i feel are the most important factor. i too judge a celeb like this only especially star kids.

Quote

crazygul

@crazygul

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#27

i think its high time to realise of industry people that like you didn't get any help but still you succeed. so if your children have the talent handwork they will succeed too.

Quote

crazygul

@crazygul

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#28

there are stars whose children were not successful but their grand children got success. success can't be same in every generation.

Quote

AladdinKaChirag

@AladdinKaChirag

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#29

The only deol i like is abhay deol... I want to see him and nobody else ! 😳

Quote

Meera

@MeeraHK

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: return_to_hades
@Nikhil92. I am not going to quote you because you have erratically giant text. Not sure if it is intentional or posting glitch.
Anyway, while I do agree that acting is greater than looks; Bollywood has historically been a shallow industry that focuses on looks especially for heroes. If looks had not been important the likes of Nana Patekar, Om Puri, Paresh Rawal who in my opinion are phenomenal actors would have been the leading men of our films. Occasionally we do have ordinary looking people like SRK or Ajay Devgan become successful as leading men, but it requires a lot of hard work. There is absolutely nothing wrong in saying they do not look like hero material. It is entrenched in realism.

No one explicitly said he is not worthy being an actor either. But nothing wrong in saying that either. To be worth of anything a person has to prove their worth. Currently, he has done nothing to prove it. He has not even attended any performance training. He is getting everything handed on a silver platter. If he is talented and dedicated - he will succed against all odds. If he is someone just being propped up by daddy dear - he will fail. Remember what happened to Kishen Kumar, Mimoh Chakarborty etc.

Nikhil92. I am not going to quote you because you have erratically giant text. Not sure if it is intentional or posting glitch...

wanted to say the same dear...😕