Bollywood's dirtiest secret: The non-gentleman's code of dishonour

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

TheBoss

@TheBoss

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Bollywood does roll on the policy of you scratch my back I will scratch yours but both people are able to hold their peace since they "scratched" each other. The problem I have with Kangana is that she was only scratching herself.

Quote

bigul

@bigul

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

1-so inspite of pc's 15 years career, padmashree, 1 national award people mention about a certain bollywood superstar each time

what about amitabh, 46 years career, 5 NAs, padmashree, padma bhushan, padma vibhushan, 7 hon doctorates...inspite of all these people never forget to mention a certain kanjeevaram-clad yesteryear actress.

2-dp -people never forget to mention her ex boy friend, so sad.

what about ranbir...uska to har roj s**t shaming hota hai inspite of whatever he has achieved in terms of career.

in the process of hating people without realisation often turn into the same thing that they hate.

Edited by bigul - 9 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

hedwig_fawkes

@hedwig_fawkes

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

It may not apply to Kangana, but that doesn't mean the article is completely invalid.

People were saying "don't make this a feminist issue" when the story initially came out, because one incident doesn't define all men etc. And now the same people are mocking feminism as a whole because Kangana was at fault. Isn't this also one incident? You are willing to invalidate an entire movement and call people "feminazis" etc based on just one incident? It's not like feminism came into play only and only because of Kangana. If one incident can prove that "it's not about man vs woman", then what about the millions of cases that prove otherwise? But no, those don't count.

Sorry, this has nothing to do with the topic, but the glee with which certain people (including girls) are dissing feminists and feminazis on the basis of one incident is sad. Perhaps this is why things will never change.

Quote

I am a proud Hindu

@colossial2015

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: kritz.anYa.vivu
One more thing is, why does the writer think that because kangna has three national awards, then this should matter to Hrithik and he should respect her ? Really if that is how somebody's character certificate could be given then I assume that if kangna would not have these awards then she would just have no credibility and support at all. Hrithik might not have a national award but in the pop culture he is a bigger achiever and a bigger star and he was not given his stardom for free . So it does not really matter what awards kangna have, she has behaved like a pathetic human being and has abused men to an extent of forcing them to open up and file a legal suit against her.

One of the Kangana supporter on IF always uses the national award excuse for Kangana. I know she is a good actor but that does not means she is a great honest person which has proved on IF. Everyone knows what a big time liar she is.
As far as Deepika is concerned Kangana always tries to use her name. Sometimes she blames Deepika for not congratulating her and sometimes blames her for stealing her movies and roles. She always bad mouths her.
I do not like Anuksha much but she never gives statements full of lies and false accusations like 3 times national award winner does. Virat is the flavor of the season so is Anuskha for her role in Sultan. She is trying to get their names to get positive publicity.
The author of this article looks like has been paid very well by Kangana to gather support. Now this plan of pseudo feminism has fallen flat on her face.

Quote

745671

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

[quote] It may not apply to Kangana, but that doesn't mean the article is completely invalid.People were saying "don't make this a feminist issue" when the story initially came out, because one incident doesn't define all men etc. And now the same people are mocking feminism as a whole because Kangana was at fault. Isn't this also one incident? You are willing to invalidate an entire movement and call people "feminazis" etc based on just one incident? It's not like feminism came into play only and only because of Kangana. If one incident can prove that "it's not about man vs woman", then what about the millions of cases that prove otherwise? But no, those don't count.

[/quote]

The feminism and feminazi thing was brought up in the first place by the misogynists of this forum. Nobody was even relating their support of Kangana to that.

It's just some people were so upset and enraged that anyone was daring to give some support to Kangana that they started screaming "feminazi feminazi!!" as if it was the only reason anyone could support her and not automatically sing Hrithik's praises.

It was a deliberate ploy from the beginning.

Remember that some of the same people on the forefront of this "feminazi!!" tirade are also the ones that used to post crazy 'men's rights" stuff and whine constantly about women "misusing" rape laws regardless of the fact that that probably happens extremely rarely. They have a very obvious agenda.

Edited by anonymous39 - 9 years ago

Quote

1017676

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

When everything else fails lets bring the gender game shall we? Playing the victim of gender biased society eh? Not working here. It's not about gender anymore.

Every freaking thing about the article is sexist. And KR's PR should be the last people to bring Deepika's name to garner sympathy and defend KR.

Winning national award has nothing to do with psychological issues KR seems to suffer.

She may find cure for cancer next but she still seems to have issues.

Doesn't it work for Ladies in BW as well. Men are ruthless so are women. Again it is not gender specific.It depends on an individual.

Quote

sia

@Serendipity..

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

Lol what an idiotic article. Kangana, this ain't working. I don't think after all this nonsense anyone in their right senses would like to sympathise with you. And why the fish is gender coming into picture here. If I'm not wrong, Kangana was the one who was being supported initially. She was given the benefit of doubt. But now we all know the truth that she's nothing but a delusional fool who needs help. She brought all this upon herself. Don't feel anything for her although she's a great actress and all that. And why shouldn't Hrithik be supported ? He's been proven innocent hence all the support. I see no harm in it. This is not some gender war where the woman shd be portrayed as the victim an that all the support shd be shown towards her. Pathetic attempts by Kanagana and her PR.

And why drag Anushka , Deepika s names? Kanagana can never be half as dignified as them. Tey have never stopped to such low ever. So Kangana needs to stfu and let this be.

Quote

440733

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#18

If a person has repeatedly shown they are crazy, then they are just plain bat shit crazy. Being a female in a sexist world or achieving loads of accolades for whatever you have done IS NOT an excuse to forget or turn a blind eye to their insanity.

Going by the author's logic, anyone who has achieved so much in life cannot obviously be held responsible for whatever wrong they have done. In that case, there are MANY intelligent and talented criminals in history who have done a lot in their lives yet ended up doing MANY terrible things too so does that mean they should not be held responsible since obviously they are such brilliant people? 🥱

We may live in a country that is majorly sexist but let's not use the "Woe is me, I am helpless woman in a man's world" card for stupid crap like this. There are women out there who actually need help against discrimination and these popular actresses are NOT one of them.

Quote

1053501

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: hedwig_fawkes
It may not apply to Kangana, but that doesn't mean the article is completely invalid.
People were saying "don't make this a feminist issue" when the story initially came out, because one incident doesn't define all men etc. And now the same people are mocking feminism as a whole because Kangana was at fault. Isn't this also one incident? You are willing to invalidate an entire movement and call people "feminazis" etc based on just one incident? It's not like feminism came into play only and only because of Kangana. If one incident can prove that "it's not about man vs woman", then what about the millions of cases that prove otherwise? But no, those don't count.

Sorry, this has nothing to do with the topic, but the glee with which certain people (including girls) are dissing feminists and feminazis on the basis of one incident is sad. Perhaps this is why things will never change.

Actually girls/women themselves are their worst enemies. Engaging in such appalling behaviour just to look 'cool'. 🥱

Also, even if some people made this a feminist issue, so freaking what? Why do they have to be ridiculed all the time? Such occurrences are common in the (BW) industry anyway so I don't understand why they have to shamed all the time for (initially or still) supporting Kangana. It's not exactly a far-fetching situation.

And finally, people have a right to support and defend whoever they want. So called psychos too. It is the personal attacks to fans that is way below the belt. Especially by a certain Hrithik fan MID who said Kangana's supporters are also psycho like her etc.

P.S. I've long been out of this and I am in no way supporting anyone, in fact I abhor both Hrithik and Kangana now but couldn't help comment here..

Quote

slumgod..

@slumgod..

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: hedwig_fawkes
It may not apply to Kangana, but that doesn't mean the article is completely invalid.
People were saying "don't make this a feminist issue" when the story initially came out, because one incident doesn't define all men etc. And now the same people are mocking feminism as a whole because Kangana was at fault. Isn't this also one incident? You are willing to invalidate an entire movement and call people "feminazis" etc based on just one incident? It's not like feminism came into play only and only because of Kangana. If one incident can prove that "it's not about man vs woman", then what about the millions of cases that prove otherwise? But no, those don't count.

Sorry, this has nothing to do with the topic, but the glee with which certain people (including girls) are dissing feminists and feminazis on the basis of one incident is sad. Perhaps this is why things will never change.

Since, I am one of the person who bring FEMINAZIS, I have to quote you. Just to make it clear, I have no problem with FEMINIST. It is FEMINAZIS which make everything man vs woman instead of right vs wrong. If you have followed Hrthik vs Kangana case, you will notice that there were some people ( Just wanna stress some instead of all) people ohh Kangana is female, she is right. And same set of people like bashing Hrithik as if he represents whole male population. Those same set of people ( again not all) were throwing judgement against Hrithik (whom I dont even care about) and supporting Kangana. So, no one is mocking whole feminist based on one issue. It is against some FEMINAZIS who are hell bent to support just because Kangu is a female.