Hrithik was never involved with Kangana - Page 9

Originally posted by: SunHarsh4eva

and i feel sorry for those pseudo intellectuals who jump on and attack the fans for supporting the fav actors while being more intellectual and holy they themselves end up supporting their own favorite blindly .😆

Originally posted by: whereiam

Yes he is a nice guy belive it or not 😃 if he was lying, then why didn't her lawyer expose him with some valid proofs instead of talking rubbish in that long and meaningless statement ?

In this mess , as has been reiterated over n over , there is no winner , only two loosers .. so of course , people are free to take sides based on their own preferences & form their own opinions, nothing wrong with it .. but what I find disturbing is how blatantly sexist Kangana supporters have been in their approach & they aren't even ashamed to do so .. they seem to be very very honest & open about the fact that the major reason for them to support Kangana is her gender & the major reason to trash Hrithik is his gender .. these feminazis are sexists of highest order .. for them the world is divided into men & women , human beings are irrelevant , what's relevant is "gender" - man is the villain & woman is the victim , no exceptions.. what's baffling is they actually have the audacity to go even further & judge others for not being as sexist as they are , but then again I suppose all sorts of bigots are also entitled to their own opinions , this is a free forum after all .. 😆


This victim woman card faces the threat of being maxed out on account of being used & abused over wrong instances .. hopefully , it won't be rendered useless when in true desperate need ..

OT : Hard to believe it , itna sab kuch ho gaya & there was never an affair to begin with ?! 😕

On second thoughts , given how Kangana's credibility has gone for a toss with her Paris proposal story , the entire thing might have been just her imagination .. or Hrithik might be just doing mauke pe chauka .. 😆 .. he is like "nobody will believe her now anyways , why not disregard the entire affair ?" .. 😆 .. Kangana shot her own foot with her unintelligent lies .. if you are prepared to lie anyways at least do so a bit intelligently .. 😆 .. but on the brighter side , Mr. Narcissist Goody Two Shoes's image has also suffered , he cannot be seen as the heartbroken loving husband anymore coz people know very well that he too has been cheating on his wife throughout his marriage ..


So , that's back to square one ..both are loosers .. ⭐️

Originally posted by: Quixotic-Frenzy

In this mess , as has been reiterated over n over , there is no winner , only two loosers .. so of course , people are free to take sides based on their own preferences & form their own opinions, nothing wrong with it .. but what I find disturbing is how blatantly sexist Kangana supporters have been in their approach & they aren't even ashamed to do so .. they seem to be very very honest & open about the fact that the major reason for them to support Kangana is her gender & the major reason to trash Hrithik is his gender .. these feminazis are sexists of highest order .. for them the world is divided into men & women , human beings are irrelevant , what's relevant is "gender" - man is the villain & woman is the victim , no exceptions.. what's baffling is they actually have the audacity to go even further & judge others for not being as sexist as they are , but then again I suppose all sorts of bigots are also entitled to their own opinions , this is a free forum after all .. 😆


This victim woman card faces the threat of being maxed out on account of being used & abused over wrong instances .. hopefully , it won't be rendered useless when in true desperate need ..

Originally posted by: anonymous39

If someone starts emailing you out of the blue, why would you ignore them? That part doesn't make any sense at all.

At least initially, in the beginning, he would reply to her to clear her misconceptions and ask her to stop contacting him. THEN he would ignore her.

Why does he keep claiming he never ever emailed her even once? Why not?! She wasn't a random person. She was a coworker he has worked twice with and attended parties for her and vice versa.

That still makes me think he had another ID he used to communicate with her from before. When she got the new one from wherever, he totally ignored her.

Originally posted by: Toontoon.

And you are writing essays after essays for the two losers.

now tell me who's the bigger loser over here?

I think so far, including all Hrithik-Kangana threads ( & those are way too many ), my "essay" count would be no more than 4 .. 😆


Ah , but a newbie going around quoting people .. 😆 .. they are always loosers in my dictionary & believe you me , I have had more than my share of newbies .. 😆

Originally posted by: Zeeliciousxo

Oh please...get off your high horse. May I be as bold to say that many of the people strictly against Kangana are in that position because she is their favourite's rival???

Your entire paragraph is moot based on your own sentence in the beginning: "<font size="2">people are free to take sides based on their own preferences & form their own opinions, nothing wrong with it" Before you have the nerve to go around pointing fingers about "sexism" do a little research about what entails sexism or not. This is a discussion forum and on this forum many things are DISCUSSED, it does not mean that you can automatically assumethe things I discuss are my major reasons for supporting Kangana. They can be important reasons, but who said it's the major reason??</font>

<font size="2">My main reason to "trash" Hrithik is his gender?? Are you high?? My main reason to dislike Hrithik is his PERSONALITY. I only think he has additionally abused his male privilege in this case, which he HAS.</font>

<font size="2">"</font><font size="2">these feminazis are sexists of highest order .. for them the world is divided into men & women , human beings are irrelevant , what's relevant is "gender" - man is the villain & woman is the victim , no exceptions." Here you preach about what YOU think people believe, people generalizing, and yet you do the same. First of all, you couldn't be more wrong in your outrageous andridiculously stupid judgements, secondly you must be extremely delusional and quite frankly a fool if you think you know what people want: "</font><font size="2">they actually have the audacity to go even further & judge others for not being as sexist as they are" Are you kidding me?? What a way to twist things to try to come out the other end as the good folk.😆I'm not afraid to admit if I do this type of shit, what I do and think is my right, but the fact that you are completely wrong and yet think you can go around preaching things as if they aredefinitive is somind boggling...</font>

<font size="2">Oh yeah,people are entitled to their own opinions as long as their opinions reflect yours...if they don't...then they are simply "bigots" who have opinions...thehypocrisy of someone who preaches ignorantly throughout her entire post and then ends her post "but I guess all are free to believe what they wish"...what crap!!</font>

Your entire post screams "I , me , myself" ... how am I supposed to reply to that ? 😆

I did not follow your stand or your posts all through this fiasco .. my post was a generic one based on whatever observations I made throughout the multiple HR-Kangana threads ( or the threads which I have been through ) .. I am not going to bother with going back to those threads & quoting them for you ..


Assuming you have been a part of this discussion throughout , answer me this - Can you honestly say that Kangana supporters never supported her for gender reasons ? .. all through the forum I have been brushing past the posts hailing Kangana for being a woman against a powerful man .. or was that my imagination ? .. holy shit ,you must be mistaking me for Kangana .. 😆


Do you want me to give you the links to definition for "Sexism" or are you capable of doing it on your own ? .. Sure by definition , "it is typically against women" but Sexism essentially means " prejudice against someone's sex" .. is that enough for you to deduce what I meant in my post ? .. or do you need to do some more research on the subject ?.. 😆 .
Either ways debating with a screaming feminazi is pointless in itself .. so please feel free to believe whatever pleases you .. doesn't make much of a difference - neither to you & definitely not for me .. 😆

Originally posted by: Toontoon.

Blah blah.

And thanks for not writing essay in response.

You are welcome dearie .. 😳

So what's your previous known ID in this forum ? .. or didn't you have any one of those yet ? .. 😆

I will miss the drama when they settle this 😳. Very entertaining 😆