Female Superstardom - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

68

Views

9.1k

Users

26

Likes

137

Frequent Posters

Chippeshwini thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: atominis

I see men being bashed all the time and their personal lives being discussed more than films.

Doing just good work in own space is not enough.

You have to be equally relevant. Like LeadNitrate mentioned Devika Rani and her clout.

I find women are kicked out more easily these days. Earlier, a Sridevi could say openly that an AB film doesn't have much for heroines to do yet still get offers opposite him. A Nutan didn't work with Dilip Kumar all her life but still she was successful. These days, girls assert themselves even once, and they are OUT or forced to change their stance/statement. These days even seniors have no guts. Meena Kumari had blasted Anand and said Rajesh Khanna was too chubby and healthy to pass off as a dying cancer patient. Does any senior actress have such guts now? Maybe Jaya has but she is bashed like anything and it is ensured that she doesn't even get mummy roles anymore.

It is bad how either criteria for female stardom is relaxed besides, increasingly regressive attitude towards them both in industry and otherwise.



phir bhi

the minute someone says that an actress is good enough to be a contender to the Khans, people spit out foam in disgust and say all sorts of shit about the woman.

I think people are TONS more territorial about male celebrities
fivestars thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#42
its because heriones do flower pot roles which dont give them recognition in most of the movies and movie runs on hero shoulders...so the superstardom credit going to hero is just fine IMO..

if we want to watch a movie first we see who the hero is.. says its all..when this mind set change and audience go to watch movies for female lead then the said female superstrdom has achieved...which i hope we will be seeing in future..
640117 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: atominis

I see men being bashed all the time and their personal lives being discussed more than films.

Doing just good work in own space is not enough.

You have to be equally relevant. Like LeadNitrate mentioned Devika Rani and her clout.

I find women are kicked out more easily these days. Earlier, a Sridevi could say openly that an AB film doesn't have much for heroines to do yet still get offers opposite him. A Nutan didn't work with Dilip Kumar all her life but still she was successful. These days, girls assert themselves even once, and they are OUT or forced to change their stance/statement. These days even seniors have no guts. Meena Kumari had blasted Anand and said Rajesh Khanna was too chubby and healthy to pass off as a dying cancer patient. Does any senior actress have such guts now? Maybe Jaya has but she is bashed like anything and it is ensured that she doesn't even get mummy roles anymore.

It is bad how either criteria for female stardom is relaxed besides, increasingly regressive attitude towards them both in industry and otherwise.


There may be regressive attitude towards the females now, but that's because these women themselves don't respect themselves for example like DP was laughing at her holes, and degrade at women including mocking herself every time intentionally/unintentionally. Kareena who's fine taking flower pot roles. But one thing which has improved for female actresses is their personal life and their image in society. They have gained respect which IMO is way better. Before from what I can see, most actresses were either having affairs with married men, or mistresses to them, or were marrying married men. I think it's because of how the female actresses image was. No one wanted them or to marry them. Society didn't really took acting for females especially as respectable profession, so the actress had to survive having married men, etc and ruining their lives. There are many stories of past actresses having tragic lives. Compared to then, now the actresses have good, or at least a better, image in society. They are dating single guys whom they actually like/love and are well off.

They actresses now also can do movies after 30s to at least even till 35. I hope this age increases till 45 and it's becomes normal as if it's 45 age is 35 like now as the years pass by.
lhcj21 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: Chippeshwini

I simply think people don't enjoy women getting the better share of attention 😆

Look at the current lot! Deepika does amazing work, but people will only remember her for her cleavage shit.

Kangana is an amazing actress, but people will only remember her for her attitude.

Vidya is an amazing actress, but people will only look at her weight.

It seems to be a lot easier to find faults in actresses, while the actors themselves look half-assed, with sagging skin and identification to people who visit beer bars at 3PM (you know who I'm talking about :D)


I have to disagree here a bit. Look at past years. We don't have actresses today like Sridevi or Madhuri. Both actresses were strong, talented, and stood out among their male co-stars. And both were popular. Sridevi more. Nobody put them down.

Nowadays there's a lot of focus on sex appeal. I almost feel like it's hard to be an actress today without also being a sex symbol and showing a lot of skin. That's the reason they have actresses in movies today. Skin show and item songs. Yes, they did that in the past also, but it was less, and not in every single movie. With all this skin show it's hard for women to get people to focus on their acting.

Deepika is a good actress, but again she shows a lot of skin and is considered a sex symbol. I used to wish that she would do a few movies that didn't require her to show a lot of skin. I haven't watched Piku, but it seems like she doesn't reveal a lot in this one, and if that's the case, I'm glad!

Kangana and Vidya are good actresses, but do not stand out enough. There are many good actresses but a female superstar is the one who can outshine her male co-star and draw the attention towards her. She also has to have a wide mass appeal. Very few women have been able to achieve that.
lhcj21 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: _Darling_


There may be regressive attitude towards the females now, but that's because these women themselves don't respect themselves for example like DP was laughing at her holes, and degrade at women including mocking herself every time intentionally/unintentionally. Kareena who's fine taking flower pot roles. But one thing which has improved for female actresses is their personal life and their image in society. They have gained respect which IMO is way better. Before from what I can see, most actresses were either having affairs with married men, or mistresses to them, or were marrying married men. I think it's because of how the female actresses image was. No one wanted them or to marry them. Society didn't really took acting for females especially as respectable profession, so the actress had to survive having married men, etc and ruining their lives. There are many stories of past actresses having tragic lives. Compared to then, now the actresses have good, or at least a better, image in society. They are dating single guys whom they actually like/love and are well off.

They actresses now also can do movies after 30s to at least even till 35. I hope this age increases till 45 and it's becomes normal as if it's 45 age is 35 like now as the years pass by.


It's harder for women these days also because Bollywood constantly shows off women as sex symbols. Women don't have enough meaningful roles that can make people focus on their acting and not their bodies. I believe Kareena is a good actress and can do so much better, but her item numbers are just cheap!! I'm sure she's getting paid well for it, but it's not helping the image of women in Bollywood. But I believe Kareena has the potential to become a superstar. Her acting is strong. If she made a movie that was centered on her, it could become successful. I'd like to see her being the central character in a female-centric movie and a guy making a special appearance just to do an item song!!

Katrina is regarded as one of the more successful actresses today, but exactly why is she successful? Looks, dancing, item songs, and being paired with A-list actors? Can you remember her for a strong acting performance? To me, she's one of the best "accessories" in films.

As far as actress's personal lives, yes, they are not having affairs with married men anymore. If that came out in public, she would be scrutinized for it. Even the guy too.

And when it comes to increasing an actress's age range, Monica Belluci recently became a bond girl at 50 which is a breakthrough in Hollywood! So I have hope that similar changes will happen in Bollywood!
ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: atominis

@ponymo

Madhuri has done more films this is why she has more flops also. Is this not common sense?

Madhuri was actually doing work in cinema than killing time at red carpets, PR events, interviews, fashion shows, photo shoots only.

You easily forget the hits that MD carried on her shoulders and the sheer draw she was. That popularity is nothing which does not translate into anything tangible in real life.

Mere popularity is not stardom. No matter how much you or others spin it.

And as I said it is funny that TM talked in comparison to male superstars but people here are relaxing criteria for females! 😆
Amusing that you jumped to DTPH but forgot hits that she gave with flop newcomers (Dil with Aamir who was struggling after multiple flops post QSQT, Raja with flop Sanjay Kapoor. Ash worked with flop newcomer Abhishek but could not give him a hit!).


@Rotlu

No I am not in media or journalism.


I did not just mention her number of flop films, but flop rate, which is certainly not better than Ash.

She was "actually doing work in cinema than killing time at red carpets, PR events, fashion shows and photoshoots" because there was hardly anything happening during the 90s. That is the reason some actors used to shoot more than one film a day. It was not restricted to Madhuri alone. As media became global and as entertainment field diversified, new avenues opened up and so did the opportunities, and to an extent that Madhuri is now doing almost everything else but movies now.

I did not forget the hits Madhuri gave. I do give her credit just as I give credit to Aishwarya for Taal, Jeans, Chokher Bali. But saying as a superstar one needs to be a major draw at the ticket counter contradicts your other argument because by MD's BO record, she will not be eligible for that tag either. That said, she was very much a superstar regardless of some of her films' fate. She danced her way into the hearts of people and is one of the most popular actresses of Hindi cinema.

I didn't really jump to DTPH. I acknowledged that she gave hits but far and few between. Also that oh she couldnt give a hit with newcomer Abhishek is again a fallacious argument, just like I can say oh Madhuri couldnt give a hit with newcomer Akshaye either.

There are several factors as to why films work. It is not as basic as saying ok we got this superstar so a good opening is certain (that only holds true for Khans post-2008/09).
Rekha_ji thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#47
Dimple Kapadia became an overnight sensation in 1973 with her first film Bobby. She also won the Best Actress Award for it. However she got married that year and returned after a divorce in 1984 and she rose to the top again winning the coveted award in 1985.
Who knows what would have happened if she continued during the 70s.

-

More recently I think Deepika + Vidya were huge debuts. Lots of hype. Asin too. And Sonakshi to an extent.

-

But now looking at it more... apart from Hrithik in 2000 and Ranbir in 2007 - I don't recall such overnight superstardom for many males either.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#48
@ponymo

Deepika has also given hit with flop Ranveer in RL.

Just because Ash could never be a draw you are trying to say no actress was ever a facfor in drawing audience at ticket counters. Madhuri had flops but she also had hits which Ash never had. It is a fact her presence never influenced a film's fate majorly.

You can keep divorcing box office from superstardom. But that's not how things work. Ash is a superstar model not a superstar actress.

@Chippeshwini

That's because actresses are indeed not comparable to male stars. It was fair to compare in case of a Madhuri or Sridevi. But not in case of any 2 hit wonders like Kangana or Vidya. That's just exaggerating so called woman power for the heck of it while the most they can do is what a Khan film already did 5 years ago. 100 crore is total underperformer for a Khan now. So why and how can you compare chillar hits with these? Change criteria at will to prop females at par with males?

@Darling

Females were always bitchy. But they still got better deal earlier. They do better these days due to business opportunities and TV, other media. Still they are not a calling card like they were in past. Theymcannot assert themselves and still get offers. Today's stars also lack loyalty and respect. Maybe SRK works with Kajol. Otherwise no one else keeps working with heroine even if she gives him success. Rajendra Kumar, Rajesh Khanna, Dharmendra stuck to Sadhana, Sharmila Tagore, Mumtaz, Hema Malini when their films clicked with them. Today's stars don't!
Earlier there was more loyalty towards character actors also. Like after Deewar, AB had Nirupa Roy work with him as his mom in every film (even till Lal Badshah in 90s!). Do you see that in films now? HERO is everything. Others can be changed like socks!
ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: atominis

@ponymo

Deepika has also given hit with flop Ranveer in RL.

Just because Ash could never be a draw you are trying to say no actress was ever a facfor in drawing audience at ticket counters. Madhuri had flops but she also had hits which Ash never had. It is a fact her presence never influenced a film's fate majorly.

You can keep divorcing box office from superstardom. But that's not how things work. Ash is a superstar model not a superstar actress.


I am not "divorcing" box office from superstardom so to speak. I did say it was a component but not the be all and end all of everything. If you think it is the single most component then I beg to differ.

Madhuri had flops but she also had hits which Ash never had? Aishwarya was called the hero of Jeans which was a mega hit. She was able to deliver a success with Taal as its lead hero with the male actors playing less meatier characters and them not being superstars themselves. She gave a huge fillip to an otherwise mediocre Bunty aur Babli through her song Kajra Re which was a rage around the country. And she ventured into new territories in Bengali and English cinema and did give hits there with Chokher Bali and Bride and Prejudice. Now, she did give flops. But to take away credit when she delivered hits isn't acceptable.

You claim box office being the sole parameter of superstardom but when when I bring up the fact that Madhuri has had only about 15 hit films out of the 70 films she starred in, there is no justification for the 50-odd films that she did which did not perform all that well.
lhcj21 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: Sridevil

Dimple Kapadia became an overnight sensation in 1973 with her first film Bobby. She also won the Best Actress Award for it. However she got married that year and returned after a divorce in 1984 and she rose to the top again winning the coveted award in 1985.

Who knows what would have happened if she continued during the 70s.

-

More recently I think Deepika + Vidya were huge debuts. Lots of hype. Asin too. And Sonakshi to an extent.

-

But now looking at it more... apart from Hrithik in 2000 and Ranbir in 2007 - I don't recall such overnight superstardom for many males either.


Deepika was appreciated and recognized in OSO, but the main focus was still on Shahrukh. Same with Vidya. She gave a good performance, but still nothing that stood out above the crowd.

Speaking of female debuts, how can I forget one of the best ones...Mahima Choudhury!!! Her debut was one of the strongest female debuts I have ever seen. You can argue that Pardes was a Mahima movie and not a Shahrukh movie, because her strong performance overshadowed his. It's really unfortunate that she wasn't able to carry on her success and deliver more strong performances.

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Maroonporsche · 1 months ago

https://youtu.be/IXaPpDYgwYg?si=nCUE0VAJ5adtYPiM https://youtu.be/FudfVyYWNxQ?si=LtBcYnpVsoKDafd1

https://youtu.be/IXaPpDYgwYg?si=nCUE0VAJ5adtYPiM
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Sparkle_Soul · 2 months ago

Her PR flunkies and minions really convinced us back in May that she is playing the main female lead in King but guess what? She is totally...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 3 months ago

https://youtu.be/asG7cwxi1sA

https://youtu.be/asG7cwxi1sA
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 4 months ago

https://youtu.be/3pYKz7Ex-28

https://youtu.be/3pYKz7Ex-28
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: irene2010 · 5 months ago

Hi... Just curious or too early to discuss ?

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".