Why didn't Salman give highest grosser of all time film on his own?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

965891

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: AishMinoz
RNBDJ was an ATG too

The point is all the actors have given atleast one ATG on their own but not Salman.Why?

Edited by RogerFedrer - 10 years ago

Quote

965891

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: LaFUNgA
MPK = 14 Cr has beaten all Madhuri's past films Nett Collection,

Saajan - Salman/Madhuri came in 1991 made 10 Cr... ya Madhuri was Star.

How come in 3 years she became so big star that she gave 70 cr film? Na Ussey pehle, Na Uske baad 😆

only MPK to boast 😆.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

cougarTown

@cougarTown

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 10 years ago

#13

HANK was ATBB coz of madhuri? Nice joke..she herself was struggling 2,3 years before the release of the movie. Salman was a star right from MPK..if anything it was because of both salman and madz and especially their chemistry than madz alone

Quote

Kyon Bey

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 10 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: RogerFedrer
[That was one fluke.Salman gave 6 flops before HAHK.Most of Madhuri's films from 1990 before HAHK were highest grossers of the year.

1990 - Dil - 10 Cr - So it is Madhuri's HIT

1991 - Saajan - 10 Cr - Madhuri the Star

1992 - Beta - 13 Cr - Ab yeh bhi bol do Madhuri's HIT Bigger star 😆

1993 - Aankhein - 14 Cr - Not madhuri's film

Except for Aankhein = MPK = Lifetime, every film fall short despite MADHURI The Bigger star in it 😛

Quote

ChotaBheem

@ChotaBheem

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#15

😆 😆

😆😆😆

Quote

965891

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Yes, Madhuri was paid more than Salman for HAHK...😃

Hrithik and Aamir are far ahead in the game!

even Sunny Deol in his prime and now SRK.but Bollywood's so called biggest superstar couldn't manage a single ATG on his own star power.

Quote

Sultan

@I_M_SultaN

Master

+ 11

Posted: 10 years ago

#17

it was both madz n salman sucess

anyways whatever floats ur boat 😊

Quote

Kyon Bey

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 10 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: cougarTown
HANK was ATBB coz of madhuri? Nice joke..she herself was struggling 2,3 years before the release of the movie. Salman was a star right from MPK..if anything it was because of both salman and madz and especially their chemistry than madz alone

Later on a film was made on Madhuri being central character, DIL TERA AASHIQ, i never seen anyone calling it Madhuri's FLOP, it is Salman's FLOP...

Amazing concept, FLOP hui toh Salman ki, ATBB hui toh Madhuri ki 😆

Quote

Kyon Bey

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 10 years ago

#19

SRK has yet to give DECADE"s BIGGEST Hit, despite being in his 3rd Decade... Uske Fans ATG ko ro rahe hai jo sirf 131 Days ke liye the...

HAHK was 7 years ATG... 2 DECADE's Biggest Hit from Salman... What has Srk? Ghantaa 😆

Quote

965891

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: LaFUNgA

1990 - Dil - 10 Cr - So it is Madhuri's HIT

1991 - Saajan - 10 Cr - Madhuri the Star

1992 - Beta - 13 Cr - Ab yeh bhi bol do Madhuri's HIT Bigger star 😆

1993 - Aankhein - 14 Cr - Not madhuri's film

Except for Aankhein = MPK = Lifetime, every film fall short despite MADHURI The Bigger star in it 😛

Dil-Madhuri was bigger star than Aamir.

Saajan-Madhuri and Sanjay were bigger stars than Salman.

Still MPK is not ATG 😆.