Originally posted by: blue-ice
Well..I don't know ...i haven't seen the movie...but extended cameo is what your darling BOI had said😆...but u r right BOI is wrong as usual😉😆
yes, boi is wrong and u r rite as always, now be happy and let go of BOI, it doesn't deserve that much importance 😉
A very good print is out and i watched it and it was trying to be clever and philosophical but it was just bad. The direction, the pacing, the script, all disaster, not worth watching at all
I don't get what story Rampal was telling in the beginning. I mean if he was telling a real story, so does that mean the guy looked like Ranbir and therefore his character Roy looks like him? So he saw a guy rob a bank when he was 7 and then he goes on and makes three 'guns' movies and in the movie he casts a lookalike and then he also casts a lookalike of his gf and they're like identical twins, wah kiya baat hain 👏
So Roy can't steal the simple painting that's just in the house, he has to woo the girl, get inside the bedroom, sleep with her and then steal it and the girl doesn't tell anything to the police because she fall in love with him, so what if he just stole $120m painting 😆 and there was no security, I mean u would expect some security for such a painting, no 😲
and the guys who are paying Roy $120m for painting, can't just steal it, rite 😆
And he exposes himself to the police and now the officer knows his identity and yet he doesn't catch him 😆
So Rampal's gf leaves him because he is like his character Roy and she has read his script and its all about roy not about his gf, so therefore she leaves 🥱
And the director had to find a new word like 'dynamic appearance' couldn't just say he was supporting, oh no, he is a big star, if he is not the lead, that means he is doing an extended cameo or a dynamic appearance. I guess a dynamic appearance is one, where u r playing second fiddle to Arjun rampal but don't want to admit it 😉
f**k this shit
Edited by adventurousman - 10 years ago
1