would pari have done kavya better? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Parineeti couldn't have carried off the role, from no angle does she look tamilian

lol and how does a tamilian look like? And she was a tamil in 2 states I am not talking about that film. Lol what a thing to say

Originally posted by: Cutiepie Rani

Pari > Alia

<img src="http://media.tumblr.com/20c0ece62a040c75cef78c3dd2c21090/tumblr_inline_mg2ijnF5Y81rwt71l.gif" alt="" />

cute lol

I don't knw may be or may be not..alia was good as kavya so i can't think of pari at her place

NO! Pari overacts.. Alia got it just right! Actually she was the best thing about 2 states otherwise the movie was too long and Arjuns acting was sh**

Originally posted by: meribaat

The point is moot isn't it ? We can debate this back and forth, point is Pari is not doing versatile at all. Just different versions of the same character which she is extremely good at. It is great the first time, annoying the fourth. HTP was whatever ridiculous it was.

Anything is useless unless used. You can be a great talent, but unless you take risks, you will stagnate and be mediocre. Alia takes risks. She may succeed or fall flat on her face, but the braver one and hence the greater one is the person who takes risks.

Even Shradda is braver, Pari really, really needs to talk to PC on what risks are like. Until than saying she can do this or that is just an academic exercise. Let her do it and show !

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Parineeti couldn't have carried off the role, from no angle does she look tamilian

Originally posted by: Chandu2000

You are one of the very few who didn't like HTP and didn't like her character in it. No wonder you think it is also bubbly. I absolutely loved Hasee Toh Phasee and loved both the characters Nikhil and Meeta in it. You didn't understand the movie at all, no wonder you keep saying it was ridiculous.IMO, it was a very complex character and Pari acted very well in the movie.🥱

Saying someone didn't understand a movie because they didn't like And disagree that the actress acted well in it? Really? Well, I fully understood the characters and movie but didn't like the performance of pari because she constantly was sticking her tongue and eyes out I don't understand how that's handling a complex or even a quirky character properly to me it's overacting!

Originally posted by: sonia1230

Saying someone didn't understand a movie because they didn't like And disagree that the actress acted well in it? Really? Well, I fully understood the characters and movie but didn't like the performance of pari because she constantly was sticking her tongue and eyes out I don't understand how that's handling a complex or even a quirky character properly to me it's overacting!

Originally posted by: Chandu2000

This movie was not only about her quirk, it is something more. The quirk and all the madness is only when she takes the anti depressant pills. But all the other time, she was a normal quite girl who wanted only some affection.And she is very intelligent too. If you noticed nothing about the character after the quirkiness, clearly you didn't see the movie properly. Hence proved.

When did I say her character was only quirky? When you first see her character onscreen you don't know the complex part of the character yet.. You are introduced to all of her quirky habits and all.. So you clearly didn't read my post properly if you did.. You would have read that I didn't even see her acting worthy of pulling of being quirky so how can she pull the complex part of the character?