Krissh 3 - enough for a biggie? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

82

Views

6.2k

Users

14

Likes

99

Frequent Posters

643898 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Skepblun



LOL! But Krissh is a sequel of already accepted films in past and Rakesh Roshan is an experienced hand who knows pulse of the masses. I think Ra One might have made them nervous but so much that they keep absolute silence over it? Hard to digest!


but those previous films didnt have much special effects and budget like krrish 3 😆 The film has to be exceptionally good otherwise it will face the same fate as ra.one cos making great superhero films with special effects like iron-man,avengers is not BW's cup of tea IMO and thats the thing worrying them 😆
Edited by _NaughtyBoy_ - 12 years ago
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: DB_reloaded

jab teaser ayega tab dekhle na its already very hott in the trade!!!! its nt good to overhype a film!!!!



Arre kab aayega? I know it's been hot in the trade since the day it was announced. But itna sannaata kyun hai bhai?

Don't they know what competition they have this year and what expectations people have from them after success of KMG and Krissh?

Others have gone wild releasing videos, posters, pics from shooting! Inki toh release date bhi khaas nahi lag rahi...(Diwali releases always have these puja, bhai dooj excuses for them since last few years!)
DB_reloaded thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: koiza.k

first of all it should be krish-2 so this krish 3 makes absolutely no sense in my head

secondly rakesh roshan's music SUCKS! i hope he hasn't given one in it

thirdly it has PC in a commercial role where she goes OTT and hams

i have enough reasons to give this one a miss unless im in pak by then and my friends force me to watch this one



  • 1.1 First Blood (1982)
  • 1.2 Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985)
  • 1.3 Rambo III (1988)
its a trilogy the are following the rambo style

DB_reloaded thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: Skepblun



Arre kab aayega? I know it's been hot in the trade since the day it was announced. But itna sannaata kyun hai bhai?

Don't they know what competition they have this year and what expectations people have from them after success of KMG and Krissh?

Others have gone wild releasing videos, posters, pics from shooting! Inki toh release date bhi khaas nahi lag rahi...(Diwali releases always have these puja, bhai dooj excuses for them since last few years!)


they has juss started to work on the special effects there is a lot 2 be done!!! june july tak 1st trailer aaa jaega release its on nov bohut time baki hai!!!!! krrish is a successfull brand so they dunt need 2 over do it 3 months is more than enuf as marketing is very swift now adays!!!!!
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#15
Dunno why but i have a feeling that after a great opening these krrish 3 or dhoom 3 will fall flat cos of massive expcetations and would be wrapped under 170cr 😆 the real record-breaker would be hirani's P.K
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#16
Oh God! All this talk of big budget, special effects, trying something new and pathbreaking sounds eerily like Ra One!

I hope the Roshans know what they're doing. Even their release date is the same as Ra One (Diwali).

BTW, anyone has any idea? Which film has higher budget? Krissh 3 or Dhoom 3? Is Krissh 3 the most expensive film of this year?
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Oh God! All this talk of big budget, special effects, trying something new and pathbreaking sounds eerily like Ra One!

I hope the Roshans know what they're doing. Even their release date is the same as Ra One (Diwali).

BTW, anyone has any idea? Which film has higher budget? Krissh 3 or Dhoom 3? Is Krissh 3 the most expensive film of this year?


dhoom 3 wont have special effects but stunts while krrish 3 have both so i think krrish 3 !
DB_reloaded thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: _NaughtyBoy_

Dunno why but i have a feeling that after a great opening these krrish 3 or dhoom 3 will fall flat cos of massive expcetations and would be wrapped under 170cr 😆 the real record-breaker would be hirani's P.K


i will be more than happy if krrish-3 scores around 170-175 im guessing the cost of krrish wont be more than a 100cr!!!!! so if its a 170-175 nett business

with the satellite rights on the bag for around 38cr and 175cr would give roshans a share around 85crs so they would have a healthy profit ...so its a superhit 4 it to be blokbuster it has be 190-195cr!!! which is highly unlikely!!!!
DB_reloaded thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#19
krrish likely to have a budget around 100cr max i guess they wont spend lyk ra one

and dhoom should be around 90cr-100cr aswell coz ETT was around 90cr(included salman khan fees)
Kal El thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#20
I guess they are waiting until they have finished some (all?) of the effects work before they release any teasers. They want the audience to be awed by the mindblowing (?) VFX. Plus they might be arrogantly believing the brand is strong enough so that they can wait this long. 🤔


Originally posted by: DB_reloaded


  • 1.1 First Blood (1982)
  • 1.2 Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985)
  • 1.3 Rambo III (1988)
its a trilogy the are following the rambo style



For that comparison to work they should have called Krrish, Krrish: Koi... Mil Gaya Part II. 😆 Plus First Blood was also about the character John Rambo. But KMG was about Rohit and it is only with Krrish that the adventures of Krishna begin. The numbering is just ridiculous.

They are probably doing it for numerological reasons not because they are following Rambo or anyone else's style. IMO if they really felt they couldn't add the '2' for whatever reason then they should have avoided numbers altogether and used a subtitle or something. Unless only that particular title satisfied the numerology.
Edited by Kal El - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 6 months ago

Deepika calls out Oscars for not recognising Indian cinema enough https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHiunMyyOYL/?utm_source=ig_embed

Expand â–¼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".