Who is better actor? hrithik or saifu - Page 26

Originally posted by: poppy2009

I was not comparing Aamir to Hrithik...that's like comparing the Sun to a lighbulb!😊

I was just negating your statement that 'Hrithik is the most versatile actor in Bollywood'!

If time is what you choose to further your argument...then Ranbir Kapoor is miles and miles ahead of Hrithik. And Ranbir debuted in 2007...7 years after Hrithik's debut and he has already played...

A politician

A playboy

A passionate lover

A rockstar

A middle-class salesman

A college kid

In just 9 films done in just 4 years, he has already proved his versatality...something which Hrithik is still to do, in 12 years!

so r we now discussing if ranbir is better than saif or is he less versatile since he has done fewer roles? hR has played double roles, and that too father and son, which is difficult to play. moreover who can recall any of saif's or ranbir's movies barring a few?

Originally posted by: EmmaFrost

just doing versatile roles don't mean everything...what matters how convincing you look and act in ur roles... as a neutral viewer i think he has justified in a handful of roles mentioned above and that goes for hrithik as well.

Saif is luck to have a fan like you who watches all his movies, becuase most ppl dont go to the trouble to do so, cant be bothered to see him for 3 hrs, so may be that is why we have not doscovered how great he is as an actor.. sorry buddy...😆

Originally posted by: desigal90

This thread is an insult to Saif, it really is.

There, now who's being insulted? 😆

And how can people so easily dismiss Saif?
Given, the guy was practically nowhere in the 90s. His looks, his voice, his angrez deameanor made him a total misfit to be a hero.

It took him a while, but when he arrived, he made a mark.

Are you seriously telling me taht no one knows Saif Ali Khan and he cannot be compared to Hrithik Roshan?

Have people not seen Kal Ho Na Ho, Dil Chahta Hai, Hum Tum, Salaam Namaste, Love Aaj Kal, Omkara, Parineeta, Race, Love Aaj Kal in more recent times?

Hell, even those films he did with Akki back in the 90s were so well known!

To say Saif Ali Khan is not well known is saying you lived under a rock during the 90s when Ole Ole became a rage or in present day with all this recent work.

Y it is an insult, since HR fans dont waste time in creating such threads. unfortunately i got to this page coz it talks of HR. Ofcourse you are the first person comparing him to saif, till date all were comparing hm to the other 3 khans, and fyi. HR's stock has only goneup. if you understand the word acting, then watch guzaarish, where he had to emote only using his eyes!

Originally posted by: poppy2009

Rakesh Roshan's biggest hit is Karan Arjun...which was made way before Hrithik even debuted! He was an A-list director before Hrithik came into the picture...infact, it was Rakesh Roshan's films which actually saved Hrithik's career from falling apart! Koi Mil Gaya and Krissh 1 both came at a juncture when all of HR's films were flopping left, right and centre!

It was the father who saved his son's career rather than the son making the father an A-list director!

So what is your argument? After Karan Arjun, Rakesh Roshan made koyla, and a no of other movies, all flops. so? is Rakesh Roshan the most successful director? going by your logic uday Chopra should be the most successful star son!

Originally posted by: Nkapoor3

Filmfare and National

so HR has won far more wards than any actor in the first 10 yrs of his career

Originally posted by: desigal90

Beggers cant be choosers? Saif is not getting good work?

FYI

He turned down two huge projects, both Yash Raj with PC last year and he was even in talks with Vishal Bharadwaj, which didnt work out.

Upcomign films include:

A Zombie Comedy directed by the directors of Shor in the City (critically acclaimed)

Love Story by Homi (director of Being Cyrus)

And Agent Vinod

(director of Johnny Gadaar)

its his CHOI

CE that he's working with critically acclaiemd directors.

In fact Saisf himself has quoted that he became a producer only because he gets roles which the three khans and Hrithik dont do for various reasons, so he is definitely much below Hrithik in all the producer's minds🥱

Originally posted by: Relda

Talking about versatility - Saif is totally non-convincing in action roles. He is too wee-looking and his voice is too much like a pipsqueak to play the quintessential total-masala, ceetee-inducing dhishum dhishum sequences, someone who can single-handedly demolish an army of men - the raw and unmitigated action that Salman and HR excel in. Saif is good in those refined, polished, urban-leaning roles - the kinds which excites the critics, leaves the masses cold.

HR on the other hand, is not subtle enough to pull off a comic or sensitive romantic role with any kind of realism. He is good in those larger-than-life, bombastic roles, like in Krissh or AP. Which is the reason why HR has a much larger audience pull than Saif, being in the top 3 five times in the last decade

sure he can pull off comedy as well- lakhshya and znmd some scenes were awesome! plus he has won awards fro all his films since KMG excpet for kites- either filmfare or some other