Shiney Ahuja Got Bail

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

_rose

@_rose

Explorer

Posted: 14 years ago

#31

If you have the money you have the power in India... Always been like that and it will never change... just hope the right one is punished and doesn't get away... at the end...

Quote

-SalShah4eva-

@-SalShah4eva-

Elite

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: sheee
Look at his wife.
she looks so happy to have him back. Whats wrong with her?

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-l9_9vpcdU&feature=relmfu[/YOUTUBE]

👎🏼

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

sogazelle

@sogazelle

Inactive

Posted: 14 years ago

#33

People are complaining that he got bail because he's powerful. Well, if he was so powerful, he would HAVE MANIPULATED THE SYSTEM NOT TO GO TO JAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE!!! so really people... make up your minds!!! Your judicial system is a joke!... In this story both parties can manipulate the system to their own ends. If he raped her he could by the system . If he didn't rape her and someone wants him to take the fall because he's a celebrity, that person too will play with the evidence!! Your judicial system is so corrupted it is laughable!!! This story is so full of it. I mean who would want to ruin their career by raping an underaged girl in his own house? Do you guys even know that the time he was accused of rape. He had just sign a big hollywood film where he was gonna be the lead because he's a great actor and does not look typically Indian. That's an accomplishment none of the the so called bollywood celebrities will never accomplished! So again, he keeps saying it maybe someone wanted to target him. There's such a thing as JEALOUSY people. Maybe these people know that, and that's why they are granting him bail or maybe he did rape her. Who knows? Anyway, that's my 2 cents... take it as you wish, but really, don't always believe what you read and make judgment on people you don't know. Do your own research. We are in the era of the internet!!!!!

Quote

64515

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: MeghaSRKLover
but guys, read the 2nd to last bit:

Ahuja had denied the offence, while the DNA results, medical evidences and scratch marks proved his offence. Ahuja justified himself and said that his maid has given a false statement against him. He said that he has been incorrectly caught up in the rape case.

so how can they say there was DNA

then in the same article they say there was???

saazish!!

That's what I was thinking...previously the DNA evidence made it clear he was involved and now suddenly the DNA doesn't match up?

Either there was tampering or some doctors were paid to lie about the rape...but where would the maid have the money to do so? It would have to be somebody else, but that just sounds so farfetched. It seems more logical that they were paid to not match the DNA with Ahuja's