Was the Rani and Vidya kissing 'stunt' required?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Jessi

@mz.jess

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#11

Ok sure it was not required But why is it when Abhi-John do the homosexual act off-screen, it's cute or funny?

Is this us being sexist or rani and vidya are too old in the eyes of the audience to do such things?

Quite frankly, you do not see gays or lesbians ridculing people that are straight, so there is no need for anyone to act in a certain way which could be precieved as an insult to a certain group of people

It's different if it's part of a scirpt but taking it off-screen to 'promote' a film which technically has no connection whatsoever to two girl's kissing, is being stupid

Now if Vidya and Rani want to kiss eachother go for it, but do not make a joke out of an issue and of yourselves!

Nevertheless, I'm happy the film did well, it was a good story with a good message

Edited by mz.jess - 14 years ago

Quote

.shona.

@.shona.

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#12

If a great movie can be promoted by this "stunt", then let it be. Otherwise another great movie would be gone unnoticed. Don't worry media, they wont get pregnant.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Cutiepie_Rani

@Cutiepie_Rani

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 14 years ago

#13

Its REALLY not even that big of a deal!

Quote

532095

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#14

😕 I know this topic was kind of dull, but I am glad at least it was appreciated in it's own way.

Edited by eroticlover - 14 years ago

Quote

Rukhsar Ahmed

@ruky786

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 14 years ago

#15

not really but I had fun taking the mick

Quote

Nuktaacheen

@Nuktaacheen

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

#16

of course it was not required...!

but it's over and done with... us ko analyze karne se kya ho ga... controversy sells, aur aaj kal ke zamaane mein you have to stay in the limelight specially if you are trying to make a comeback... so don't blame them too much for something like this... you have to create a buzz around your movie, otherwise, movies come and go all the time, wihout getting noticed...!

there are other things i don't like, but that is not even relevant to the topic... at the end of the day, no amount of cheap publicity can get audience in the theatres... so it's good that the movie was good and liked in general...!!

Quote

532095

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: ruky786
not really but I had fun taking the mick

you always do and never dissapoint! 🤣

Edited by eroticlover - 14 years ago

Quote

Anjali

@blyton

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: mz.jess
Ok sure it was not required But why is it when Abhi-John do the homosexual act off-screen, it's cute or funny?

Is this us being sexist or rani and vidya are too old in the eyes of the audience to do such things?

Quite frankly, you do not see gays or lesbians ridculing people that are straight, so there is no need for anyone to act in a certain way which could be precieved as an insult to a certain group of people

It's different if it's part of a scirpt but taking it off-screen to 'promote' a film which technically has no connection whatsoever to two girl's kissing, is being stupid

Now if Vidya and Rani want to kiss eachother go for it, but do not make a joke out of an issue and of yourselves!

Nevertheless, I'm happy the film did well, it was a good story with a good message

Agree with the part in bold.

Quote

Antlers

@Antlers

Sparkler

Posted: 14 years ago

#19

if SRK can pull a terrorist act for publicity, if Aamir can take farmers for publicity for a film, why can't these two not make a fake kiss for a film? hmmm well. to each to his own.