why is almost everyone against salman khan

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sano

@ISano

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#31

i think people should see themself 1st if they r a good human being..

abotu killing animal let me tell u saif sonali tabu were also involved in it.. but they got free .. no charge was made on them..

WIKIPEDIA is not a valid soruce.. it can be edited by anyone..

Edited by Sallufanno1 - 15 years ago

Quote

403365

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: Sallufanno1

WIKIPEDIA is not a valid soruce.. it can be edited by anyone..

I think everyone knows that by now, but you cannot say it's not a source. It may be used for superficial research, and just to know about the situation, however if in depth research needs to be done, then it's not a credible enough source. I was told this at my English class last semester at University. We were given random topics to create a research report on, and my topic was nuclear energy. Just to understand the surface level of the topic, I used Wikipedia, and then moved on to more credible sources. That's what I did here too, for your information.

Lastly, I label him as an abuser and killer because he did commit the crimes, thus he was charged. It's another matter his stardom let him off and he's now associated with numerous charities to erase his past.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

403365

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Sallufanno1

i think people should see themself 1st if they r a good human being..
abotu killing animal let me tell u saif sonali tabu were also involved in it.. but they got free .. no charge was made on them..

I am not a devta, neither do I praise myself much because I am somewhat of a cynic, but when compared to Salman, I can proudly say that I have not abused my significant other or any human being, I haven't killed and injured people due to drunk driving, and neither have I shot endangered species.

Edited by zainab25 - 15 years ago

Quote

AdInfinitum

@AdInfinitum

Voyager

Posted: 15 years ago

#34

Its interesting to see that people take everything that comes out of Aishwarya's mouth as gospel. If she was abused by Salman she should have gone to the cops and filed a report. She didn't. She went to the press and played victim. I'm all for women's rights but if you're gonna make serious accusation like abuse, you better back it up with solid proof. If not, I'll not buy it. I do not believe for a second that she was scared. She wasn't scared to release a statement to the media, was she?

As for reports of him abusing previous girlfriends.....It was just one. Apparently, he poured coke over Somy's head according to tabloids at that time. If he had abused her, he'd not be friends with her to this day. In fact, he gets along with all his girlfriends except one. He even attended weddings of 2 of his exes.

And I agree with indianrocks, once an abuser always an abuser. Katrina has been with him for 6 years. She doesn't seem like a gal who'll stay with a guy who abuses her.

Oh and about his hit and run case, I don't know where most posters live. But let me say this. In LA, actors, singers.... famous or not, have gotten off on community service for hit and runs. Salman has been to jail. So don't say he got off free. Murder charges were dropped because they couldn't prove them. And no one knows if he was driving. The case is ongoing. If you wanna jump to conclusions based on what the press says, go ahead.

Having said all that, if someone is hell bent on hating him without knowing the full story, that's their prerogative. Not everyone is gonna love Salman. It's all good. 😆

Edited by SalmanFan - 15 years ago

Quote

104869

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#35

This forum has gone NUTS! you guys are letting ur affection for Salman get in the way of ur judgement.

Seriously he can do all the charities in the world if he wants, but he was charged for major punishable offences.

He himself admitted that he drove rashly but didnt intend to kill the people on the road- so are you guys actually justifying that it was okay for him to drive rashly under the influence of alcohol?

As I said earlier imagine if a close friend or a family member was the one killed, would you still support him?

PS. sorry it was killing 1 person not 6- but that doesnot make the crime any lesser.

Quote

104869

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#36

And do you guys know the value of LIFE? And getting killed because some alcoholic rich man just drove over you on the road because you had no other place to sleep.

Quote

AdInfinitum

@AdInfinitum

Voyager

Posted: 15 years ago

#37

Salman has repeatedly said, he was not driving.

And I'm not condoning hit and run but I need to see proof. Right now, all I have is crap written by the press who already hates him. I also have 1 more fact, he was aquitted of murder. That tells me there was no proof to make the murder charge stick. I will wait before I crucify him.

Quote

Sano

@ISano

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#38

im a university student as well

my professor told me we cant use wikipedia for our 1 year project

so thats why im saying its not at all vlaid msot of it is bullshit

Originally posted by: zainab25

I think everyone knows that by now, but you cannot say it's not a source. It may be used for superficial research, and just to know about the situation, however if in depth research needs to be done, then it's not a credible enough source. I was told this at my English class last semester at University. We were given random topics to create a research report on, and my topic was nuclear energy. Just to understand the surface level of the topic, I used Wikipedia, and then moved on to more credible sources. That's what I did here too, for your information.

Lastly, I label him as an abuser and killer because he did commit the crimes, thus he was charged. It's another matter his stardom let him off and he's now associated with numerous charities to erase his past.

Quote

Something Or The Other

@ShadowKisses

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: indianrocks
i dont know why people are jumping on to their conclusions of making him a criminal

the law is u r free until u r proven otherwise

and the statements being made by people here are like he killed animals and he killed people on the pavement are absolutely wrong until and unless his crimes are proved in The Supreme Court Of India and the court punishes him for his crimes u cannot label him a criminal

Till that time all these are charges are alleged charges and the matter is in courts let the court decide then u can pronounce him a criminal

And how are people here so sure he used to beat all his ex girlfriends he has been accused of that by only one of his ex not anyone else and if he was such an abuser then why would a modern girl like katrina still be with him even after 6 yrs

once an abuser is always an abuser

so until & until there is concrete evidence to prove your allegations against someone dont pronounce someone a criminal or an abuser

That is bureaucratic BS with the slightest touch of diplomatic equivocation.

Following on your thought process, one couldn't blame Stalin for the number of Russians he had killed during the Great Terror because no one could prove it since the bodies were destroyed. Does that make him less of a criminal? No, because he exterminated more than 30 mil. Russians. You could deduce from this that the law isn't a) all powerful b/c manipulative people with great connections can bend it and b) always correct in its decision. Especially for India, It really comes down to personal opinions, not lawful ones because the Indian judicial system is just THAT credible. Just recently, didn't some director general get merely 6 months in jail for molesting a minor who committed suicide 3 years ago? Yeah, some great moral compass the damned "law" is! Compare that with the American judicial system where they treat police brutality with a severe degree of punishment ESPECIALLY when women are concerned (4th and 14th Ammendments; Tort Act).

As far as abuse is concerned, I would always given the woman the benefit of doubt because I simply can't fathom a situation where a woman would lie about this. Of course, others can chose to give the benefit of doubt to the accused and that's fine as well. The fact that Salman comes across as a rash, rude jerk in most of his interviews makes me more inclined to believe Aishwarya's side of the story.

Quote

Sharma

@lovanika

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

#40

Originally posted by: pragya0
And do you guys know the value of LIFE? And getting killed because some alcoholic rich man just drove over you on the road because you had no other place to sleep.

Exactly...

You kill someone in your sense is a bigger crime than you do it drunk.

But someone is killed in both the situations. The family is at the recieving end.

We do not know Salman personally but we have hear of him so muc, have seen him hitting media persons, have heard him spill coke on Katrina, slap her in public, slap Somy Ali in public, make scene in front of Sangeeta's building, hunting black buck, driving car on the peopl sleeping at night......and so on...

Thing is not this that we take Ash's word ..it's that Ash was woman enough to stand up and say those things irrespective of the affect of that on her career. Whil all other of his girlfrind took it so that he might marry them, or not to face the warth of his anger. Ash did not.

When in his good mood he is very nice adn happy but when you look at his face while he is giving interviews or in an event you can see the cynism all over him.

But thats my opinion adn I do not hate him..I just enjoyed his movie Wanted SOOOO much...😃