Where is the sense of proportion or sense in all this?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

-Cruiser-

@-Cruiser-

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#51

Originally posted by: sector

Cruiser when hilarious :

...Both blessed each other with quite a few colorful decorations
...Armaan being the champion abuser ...
... If abusing is ground of arrest 80% of Delhi-Punjab belt males should be behind bars...

Cruiser when practical:

...If Bigg Boss ... categorically told him this is his last and final warning

if cops started arresting people merely based on 'Complaints', Police Station cells would have no space...

...case goes to court, any smart ass lawyer representing Armaan would blast this whole case

Sector when in love (most of the time):
....oh i still fancy Armaan...

Sector when sensible (rare):

...Someone please beat the sh*t out of Armaan and make a gentleman out of him...

🤣

Quote

Inquisitivesoul

@Inquisitivesoul

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#52

He hit her. Intentionally.

BB didn't show us that footage.Intentionally.

Kushal vs Andy footage - Shown
KRK footage - Shown
Pooja's footage - Shown.

Armaan Footage - Not shown.

There was definitely something that was not right that happened which is why they chose to not show it coz they didn't want him to leave the show.Armaan has been exonerated way too much on this show and I feel the channel/BB team are more at fault than Armaan himself. In the greed to keep a loud mouth in the house for trp purposes how could they embarrass a woman like that in a nation where the viewership mainly comprises of rural India where crime against women are high anyway.Beating women behind closed doors is a sad reality.

That's wrong on so many counts.He has no control on his anger, there was no provocation in this case.He figured she's a nobody and he could get away with it.He had no right to touch her, push her or get into her face.IT IS VIOLENCE and VIOLENCE is not justified especially on a woman who can't take you on.She finally did something to get back at him for her own dignity and peace of mind.To know that you have been assaulted and the assaulter is making mery can be very disturbing.How can him hitting her be justified? Are we not telling him its ok to do something of the sort in the future as wel by defending this act?Imagine what all he would do in his personal space if he has the audacity to do this on national television versus now with what she has done he might think twice before acting out on his whim.If this news makes any man think twice before getting violent, I am all for it. He has not been accused of something he has not done.He did it and now deserves this.I have a lot of respect for Sofia to have done this in spite of knowing the odds.So many others were abused in this show and chose to keep mum.Kudos to her and shame on the BB team, I think.

If all women fiercly protected their dignity and reported to the police any act of violation,violation or intimidation, we would a lot more safer country.

For the first time I am baffled reading your post but that's just my opinion and this is yours.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

..Underworld..

@..Underworld..

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#53

Originally posted by: -Cruiser-

No...if you objectively look at it, you are assuming there is something else in Unedited footage and at begining itself I have said, as always, I will and can, only go by what I have seen. So I am not disagreeing with you over anything...but based on WHAT I SAW, I am fine with condemnation, BB reprimand, even eviction of Armaan...NOT ARREST!😊

I am not assuming there is something else in the unedited footage...im going by the Police officer's words, who saw the whole unedited footage BEFORE arresting armaan

Quote

Wisian

@Wisian

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu
Hi Cruiser this is what I had written in another post it has the reason why they had to arrest Armaan.

The charges lavied against Armaan are IPC sections 294 (obscene acts and songs), 506 (criminal intimidation) and 354 a (sexual harassment) and 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to outrage the modesty of a woman). Out of them 354 is a non bailable offence. Before anything you would be arrested if some woman lays that charge.

Not saying that weather Armaan is guilty or not because we have not being shown enough to say weather he sexually harassed Sofia or not. Rest are all bailable warrants as far as I know.

I missed this post...
@section 354: Is it a Maharashtra-specific provision? Probably a State amendment...

Normally, you cannot be arrested simply because a woman has laid a charge. That'll be idiocy. A warrant has to be issued - after due establishment of guilt - and unless the cops accepted the unedited video of the incident and deemed it enough evidence against AK, the "arrest" is disproportionate.

Quote

-Cruiser-

@-Cruiser-

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#55

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

I am not assuming there is something else in the unedited footage...im going by the Police officer's words, who saw the whole unedited footage BEFORE arresting armaan

It still is an assumption only! 😊

OK...someone wrote he would be taken to court today itself. Lets see how it unfolds and gets resolved!

Quote

bigthullu

@bigthullu

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#56

This all thing is too shady..

what if Armaan gets his lawyers to put a case on her , and what if colours sue both of them for maybe using colors property ,, like video or other things ,,

no idea just guessing random things lol

Quote

empusa

@empusa

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#57

Originally posted by: Wisian
I missed this post...
@section 354: Is it a Maharashtra-specific provision? Probably a State amendment...

Normally, you cannot be arrested simply because a woman has laid a charge. That'll be idiocy. A warrant has to be issued - after due establishment of guilt - and unless the cops accepted the unedited video of the incident and deemed it enough evidence against AK, the "arrest" is disproportionate.

so do u really think it all happened just in a day...investigations were going on since a week

Quote

Sharif.Badmaash

@Sharif.Badmaash

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#58

Originally posted by: surbhiholic
i am seeing Arshad trying to seek publicity...

i know Sofia getting lots of support from all over world and Arshad Warsi is too small a star to get notice in support of Sofia...

thats why he is supporting Armaan so that people get to know who are supporting Arman...

He is acting he is some super star... but he is actual wanna be here not sofia for publicity tweeting... he is supporting Armaan as if he saw 24*80 days footage... get lost Arshad.
i am seeing your movie is releasing... wanna be kahin ka... you don have any logic... you could support Sofia and also could voice for all other victims...

its obvious that bollywood fraternity will support Armaan here. Even KRK is tweeting in support of him 😆

Quote

Wisian

@Wisian

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: empusa

so do u really think it all happened just in a day...investigations were going on since a week

I thought, it was quick... Wasn't it just two days ago that she claimed to have made a police complaint? 🤔
Anyhoo... I'm happy that AK is out of the game, and that Sofia punished him like she said she would. 😆

Quote

..Underworld..

@..Underworld..

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#60

Originally posted by: -Cruiser-

It still is an assumption only! 😊

OK...someone wrote he would be taken to court today itself. Lets see how it unfolds and gets resolved!

That's not an assumption..you can see from 1:07...the police officer himself speaking

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGHcDADBfuY

now dont tell me this video is an assumption only 🤢

Quote

1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17

Where is the sense of proportion or sense in all this? - Page 6

Related Topics

Explore Topics