Gauhar is too selfish

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Pesi

@pesi11

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: MocoCoco
So gauhar has 2 arguments in 2 days, let's make it a 3rd and seal the deal. 😆

I def see her having beef with every single contestant. But the day she messes with kamya will be the greatest day of all. I can totally see kamya destroying her.

i am waiting for it ... even kushal n kohli also can finish their job smoothly 😉 ..i want to see kamya shutting this gauhar 🤬

Edited by pesi11 - 12 years ago

Quote

Kezia

@MagixX

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: SoPunk

Well, I didn't dislike the concept of the game much. Concept gives equal opportunity to the housemates to be a human or a Haiwan ... Some chose to be human and Gauhar the other one.

They could easily work out a convenient schedule of limited time sleep and company them for the rest of the time. All they needed is to have a balance and a chat between both parties to settle it. The heaven party (Gauhar more) might have taken the heaven too seriously, hope they haven't started thinking that they are better than the others😆 they should've remembered that every dog has their day

I agree. And I meant exactly that..they were given a choice, and some chose not to forego their quality of basic humanity, which was fine by me. I mean, it's a matter of choice at the end of the day.

The more important question here is whether all this should be allowed. I mean, BB is taking the concept of hell a bit too far. At least in my opinion. As for heaven, some are not being very heavenly at the mo 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

SoPunk

@SoPunk

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: MocoCoco
So gauhar has 2 arguments in 2 days, let's make it a 3rd and seal the deal. 😆

I def see her having beef with every single contestant. But the day she messes with kamya will be the greatest day of all. I can totally see kamya destroying her.

Kamia had her chance to take her on today, but she decided to be diplomatically correct but her whispering to the hell mates was like the vamp she is. Didn't want to take the risk of standing against Gauhar... Looked like that. But yes, if she decides to have a go, I'm sure it will get ugly.

Quote

SoPunk

@SoPunk

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#44

Originally posted by: MagixX

I agree. And I meant exactly that..they were given a choice, and some chose not to forego their quality of basic humanity, which was fine by me. I mean, it's a matter of choice at the end of the day.
The more important question here is whether all this should be allowed. I mean, BB is taking the concept of hell a bit too far. At least in my opinion. As for heaven, some are not being very heavenly at the mo 😆

I also think so. Come on, it's not fair to limit bathroom facilities. Yaar, bathroom/toilet is out of the show anyway. He can't affect people in things which aren't part of the show.

And the way people were sent to hell for no reason, is clearly injustice and unfair to those contestants. Whatever he does later, this won't be compensated by anything...

And yes that wasn't heavenly from Gauhar 😆

Quote

Kezia

@MagixX

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#45

I'm flabbergasted at the way the channel and the show is getting away with this stuff. This just makes me believe more in the view that things in BB are not as real as depicted, and shouldn't be taken at the face value. I mean, how could a channel get away with all this if it were real? That's like abusing the basic human rights which is against our constitution.

Quote

SoPunk

@SoPunk

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#46

Originally posted by: MagixX
I'm flabbergasted at the way the channel and the show is getting away with this stuff. This just makes me believe more in the view that things in BB are not as real as depicted, and shouldn't be taken at the face value. I mean, how could a channel get away with all this if it were real? That's like abusing the basic human rights which is against our constitution.

Unfortunately they pay enough to unemployed people to sacrifice anything. Yes they could have shown something and done something, but then that wouldn't look real and brought out real reactions. And they get people eager to do it. But you are right, even if they get people, it's a clear manipulation and blackmailing with their disadvantageous position... It's definitely a violation. ..

Well, lets get back to selfish Gauhar 😆

Edited by SoPunk - 12 years ago

Quote

amy22

@amy22

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#47

I do feel Gauher is being targetted here in this firum, especially yesterday in the argument between her and Pratyusha i felt that Gauher was actually right (except for the fact that she laughed when mian mithu Pratyusha called herself a star). I dont know Pratyusha and I am not a Gauher fan, but i definitely thought Gauher was right yesterday.

Today in the argument between Gauher and Tanisha, i felt Tanisha was right and Gauher was being a little stubborn.

About food: Gauher is actually doing the right thing about food because she did share bananas and also other food was distributed according to the amount of food that is available.

Forum members need to calm down on her and not blame her for everything unfairly. Especially when Pratyusha is hella annoying and has no personality.

Quote

Kezia

@MagixX

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#48

If it comes to Gauhar and Pratyusha, I'd definitely back Gauhar. It irritates me to the core when grown-ups act like kids and think it's very innocent and oh-so-cute to do so. It's not, wannabes!

Edited by MagixX - 12 years ago