Originally posted by: raghu0307
why is it untruthful? just because you think it to be..thats what makes it an opinion.. an opinion has no specific facts associated to it. just point of views.point to think about. I genuinely believe (key word is believe) that Gautam was targeted unfairly and that was the trigger point. but thats my point of view. and I am fair enough to accept it as my opinion (not go on blabbering about I speak the truth and that is the end of it)
Okay, I'll answer this properly... You should read the first post of this thread, and then read the subsequent arguments. Many of us have together picked apart each and every aspect of the first post and have written why it is not patently valid...
You then made a post about how the majority can't be wrong - and those in the minority must accept that the majority can't be wrong. I see myself as one of the minorities here. So, I responded by telling you that you should counter our assertions without resorting to the "majority must be right"-argument. I stand by that statement. For good reason.
Why is "the opinion of the majority" incorrect/untruthful? Please first read this entire thread. Numerous other members have already written everything that there is to write about it. There is nothing more that I can write that has not already been written.
You genuinely believe that Gulati was unfairly targeted? I did too - in the first two weeks.
But are we discussing that here? NO! We are talking about whether Praneet does(n't) get a slap on his face. And what have you to counter our arguments? Gaaliyon ka bhandar?
What is even worse is the semantic distinction that you are trying to draw between truth and opinion. Please just drop it here. It is futile.
Edited by Wisian - 10 years ago