Shocking - Harassment By Pratik

95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#1

A few days ago. I saw lots of topics / clips on the harassment done by Pratik to Rajiv Like all things these days, the threads went dead and people moved on. There was back and forth.


Today the topic was raised by Salman. In no unclear terms the word “harassment” was also used along with Pratik crossing a line. Yes there was an apology. Yes as usual there was discussion on “intent” and what not.

Worst part was - Why didn’t Rajiv speak up. Noted v famous celebs have not had courage to speak about harassment in their lives for sometimes over decades. In this instance there is proof (videos), acknowledgement of this by all involved and yet we sit and say. He got bashed - so it’s done and over with.

Since when was this the acceptable standard and is this the message we want to send ? In all cases I know, this leads to immediate termination and here it should have led to immediate eviction (and not wait for wkv).


ofc we see trends on SM instead supporting Pratik (nothing new)... Shocking! Disgusting! and unacceptable !! BB can be whatever one calls it. Cheap show. Trash tv. Reality tv. But still this can’t be the acceptance over harassment.

Frankly am amazed and shocked that this didn’t cause the uproar it should for an immediate eviction!!!

Created

Last reply

Replies

68

Views

4.6k

Users

23

Likes

144

Frequent Posters

adnilover thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#2

It would have been taken seriously if Rajiv had complained against Pratik but he laughed it off. Plus Pratik also apologised.


It was all in Rajiv's hands but he chose to ignore.

95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: adnilover

It would have been taken seriously if Rajiv had complained against Pratik but he laughed it off. Plus Pratik also apologised.


It was all in Rajiv's hands but he chose to ignore.


it’s all on camera. Rajiv should not have to ask for someone’s eviction. And apology isn’t what is acceptable for what is accepted as zero tolerance behavior on this.

well. It’s strange we all agree affo ka eviction is fair (i do too). But I guess harassment is no longer zero tolerance policy by viewers. Definitely Not my view on this matter - as my stance is clear on this for this subject ..


Edited by KJasoosChulbulP - 3 years ago
adnilover thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP


it’s all on camera. Rajiv should not have to ask for someone’s eviction. And apology isn’t what is acceptable for what is accepted as zero tolerance behavior on this.

well. It’s strange we all agree affo ka eviction is fair (i do too). But I guess harassment is no longer zero tolerance policy by viewers. Definitely Not my view on this matter - as my stance is clear on this for this subject ..


The line is gone now. BB has shown such inconsistent actions towards acts of violence/harassment/self-harm that its frankly hard to tell now what should be actionable. But the harassment was definitely a very serious thing, but it got addressed by Salman despite Rajiv not raising his voice. That also was a big thing.

SidHearts thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 3 years ago
#5

Why would Rajiv speak up if he does the same?


https://twitter.com/fairy__fk/status/1459226858730704896?t=QKaWAMhfXHZwrz2sJO5yUw&s=19


And things were already sorted between them:


https://twitter.com/iamteampratik/status/1459425849325735941?t=n-bYf5ldMf3lEKojK2ml9Q&s=19


So people still wanted to be selectively blind then so be it......looks like people are still blind.

Edited by SidHearts - 3 years ago
95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#6

Zero tolerance policy means just that.. zero tolerance does not have room for apology on action to be taken… which means evict… simple…



SidHearts thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 3 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

Zero tolerance policy means just that.. zero tolerance does not have room for apology on action to be taken… which means evict… simple…




First evict Kundra then talk.

95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#8

I am not going to muddle other issues on this topic of evict Kundra Shamita pratik etc for other reasons


there is a zero tolerance policy on harrasment of the kind pratik engaged in with Rajiv. Instead uskey support Mein trend ho rahaan hain.

Guess what. Pratik himself said mooh tod deta if situation was reversed….


Eviction is the only acceptable action on this subject.

95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#9

Nope. Nothing selective …. I know this is the effort and statements made so one gets distracted from the topic … And I won’t engage in usual pratik did violence in first week and should be evicted etc. Nothing selective ….


this is harassment by pratik to Rajiv something that is zero tolerance and should have resulted in immediate eviction. Simple.

Sushma_00 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#10

Because the topic changed from Prathik harassing to Rajeev ok with prathik apologizing and shamitha vs Teja.


How i wish the topic is about what Rajeev felt and what he was going through . Eventhough he didnt want to make an issue, prathik should be punished for what he did

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".