Originally posted by: kaushikbasu
I think the case was absolved based on technicalities, hence he was acquitted?So the case is still persuaded by BCCI. Also the evidences were not as circumstantial.Police had same proof in terms of recordings as was case with Hansie. The problem was they were not authorized by the court or parties involved for recording and further DP did not seek permission from Maharashtra Police before arresting, these were some of the technical flaws.Another question is why he did not challenge his ban on entering cricket field or other cricket related programs as Azhar had and got his ban lifted.Though I agree in India a person is innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of law.