I do not understand who is Us to give shaktri to rawatji. Is shakti an object/non living that US does not like so gave to his friend rawatji?
Does shakti not have a right to say yes or no to US giving him away? He is not a baby that he is a 10 year old child and in those days at 10-12 yrs like akbar, prithviraj chauhan became emperors of a big nation at that age. Shakti is a mature persn yes a bit emotional angry young boy but that does not mean you just hand him over to anyone at this age?
Shakti could have gone to his grandparents house and recieved love and care from them. Sajjabai must be having parents right? Why was he not allowed to go to them?
Why should Pratap/Rawat decide they want him with Rawat and ask US the same? And where shall sajabai and vikram stay? Do they not want Shakti with them?
If any other father was there he would have hugged and thanked shakti because shakti defended his honour in front of the jail sepoys as a son. But what does he get in return punishment for loving his father? First death sentence and now disowned by father and given to Rawatji like some thing being discarded
No wonder shakti left US/Mewar and went to work at Mughal court. This is real human rights and child cruelty by US if it was 21st century. Lucky for him it was 15th century.
And everyone is saying Shakti has great ego so he did not say thruth to US. If any other son was there he also would not say anything. The very fact that his father suspected him to be a murderer in first place although shakti loves him more than his life despite humiliation its better not to speak and say anything because its humiliation of your love for a father. Love cannot be stated it has to be felt. US never felt that love for shakti and always humiliating him so why should he tell truth that he did for his father?
Edited by myviewprem - 12 years ago
Anupamaa
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon
