Revenge is ok, but killing is wrong - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

I dont want to argue on religion. But I believe even God helps only those who help themselves. unless you can stand up for yourself and demand justice how can God help you. unless you take action to get justice how he can help you.

God can give you the most favourable questions for the exam. But God cannot write exam for you. you have to write the answer if you need to clear the exam. By praying answers wont automatically come in paper. You should make an effort to write. Yes he can remove any other obstacle that can come in your front that can stop you from writing the exam. But writing you yourself has to do.

Coming to killing it depends on the situation. If someone comes to kill you, you will stand there and tell the person kill me, you wont even raise your hand to defend yourself.

No wonder human rights are always for criminals like Govindachamy who brutally raped a girl or the murderers of Nirbhaya and also for the terrorists. Not for the families who are orphaned by bomb attacks or the young girls life that is nipped in the bud.

See that is the fine line between reel and real.

But letting go of one criminal is killing thousand others. Which is the better option. Human right activists are arguing for protecting Surinder Koli who brutally murdered kids and buried their skeltons. Atleast 10-12 kids he have killed.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

But letting go of one criminal is killing thousand others. Which is the better option. Human right activists are arguing for protecting Surinder Koli who brutally murdered kids and buried their skeltons. Atleast 10-12 kids he have killed.

You want to save this man so that he can kill the next generation again brutally as people will come to defend him. Killing him will erase the human race or protecting will erase the human race

Sometimes killing one saves 1000 and human race at large. If that is the case you have to kill. If to protect a family you have to sacrifice one member you have to do that. If to protect a village one person has to be sacrificed it needs to be done. If to protect a country few hundreds have to be sacrificed it has to be done.

Whenever killing is concerned the larger interest is seen and if larger interest or rather more innocents or law abiding people will be protected by that killing then it has to be done. That is why capital punishment happens in the rarest of rarest cases. It is to protect the larger society from such criminals it is done because they cannot be corrected.

If you leave such criminals in the name of whatever it is you are allowing crime to flourish as no one is afraid of punishment. Rapes happen day in day out. Why no punishment. People have no fear because the way current law is implemented the criminal will go scott free in most cases.

One whose actions support Adharma to flourish also will get punishment by the ultimate law if not the law of the nation. That's why many times hypocrites run from pillar to post why we are getting punished we didnt do anything. That doing nothing has helped adharma , that doing nothing is also selfishness for which the punishment is more severe than the actual culprit.

Because you are taking moral high ground and acting like a criminal.

@Nau in real sense even if you murder for self defense you will be sentenced by the court though the quantum of punishment will be less. If you see movies like Adhipan , New Delhi or Panchagni that is what happens. The protoganist surrender after committing the murder to take the punishment from the law though they dont regret killing the criminals. Because in those days conscience worked and a protoganist meant yes he or she can kill but what differentiates them from antagonist is that they are willing to take the punishment for their act from the law of the land.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

But letting go of one criminal is killing thousand others. Which is the better option. Human right activists are arguing for protecting Surinder Koli who brutally murdered kids and buried their skeltons. Atleast 10-12 kids he have killed.

You want to save this man so that he can kill the next generation again brutally as people will come to defend him. Killing him will erase the human race or protecting will erase the human race

Sometimes killing one saves 1000 and human race at large. If that is the case you have to kill. If to protect a family you have to sacrifice one member you have to do that. If to protect a village one person has to be sacrificed it needs to be done. If to protect a country few hundreds have to be sacrificed it has to be done.

Whenever killing is concerned the larger interest is seen and if larger interest or rather more innocents or law abiding people will be protected by that killing then it has to be done. That is why capital punishment happens in the rarest of rarest cases. It is to protect the larger society from such criminals it is done because they cannot be corrected.

If you leave such criminals in the name of whatever it is you are allowing crime to flourish as no one is afraid of punishment. Rapes happen day in day out. Why no punishment. People have no fear because the way current law is implemented the criminal will go scott free in most cases.

One whose actions support Adharma to flourish also will get punishment by the ultimate law if not the law of the nation. That's why many times hypocrites run from pillar to post why we are getting punished we didnt do anything. That doing nothing has helped adharma , that doing nothing is also selfishness for which the punishment is more severe than the actual culprit.

Because you are taking moral high ground and acting like a criminal.

When I watched Star MB there is a beautiful dialogue Krishna says to Karna. It is not duri and co who is responsible for this destructive war but it is you 3 referring to bhishma, drona and Karna who with your abilities, talents supported the adharma.

As they say
"Dard sehney wala bhi utna hi bada gunegaar hai jitna ki dard dena wala"
Everyone has limits, and once the limits are crossed work should be done ;)

Well killing someone is too extreme for sure but we cannot deny that circumstances play a major role..
For eg if a girl is getting molested and she in process of defending her, hits him with a knife. Is the girl wrong here?
Another eg, in movie provoked, the lead murders her husband bcoz he tortured her. She was fed up and had no way to get out? Was she wrong?
Another eg. Recently in news a man was arrested. He is a serial rapist and had molested more thn hundreds young girls in delhi. If he gets bail or cannot be punished due to lack of proof and continues doing crime. More and more girls will be harmed. But if any of those earlier victims had managed to kill him in self defense than wont hundreds more girls would have been saved..
See, murder is not always wrong. We have to take in consideration about situations.
Just bcoz murder is a crime we cannot judge everyone as a criminal..