TRUTH IS TOLD 8.1.26
Toxic - The Tease
Is Armaan a Gunegaar?
Kartik’s Immoral behaviour consequence
Katrina and Vicky's son name is Vihaan Kaushal
Are Virani men dumb?? 😂😡
JP Duttas Daughter Stands Up For Varun
Anupama Chopra Wept Through Ikkis
VANI KI BHOJ 9.1.26
Is Hrithik-Munni helping the KSBKBT2 trp numbers?
The Raja Saab has disastrous advance
Congratulations to Kyunki
Which story would you prefer for Rajat Paridhi show together
The RajaSaab - Reviews And Box Office
O Romeo - First Look - Shahid Kapoor - Vishal Bhardwaj
hello, anyone still there?
🏏WPL 2026: Match 1: MIW vs RCBW at Navi Mumbai on 09/01/26🏏
Originally posted by: aparnauma
People are not looking down because Mangala is from the marginlaised sections of the scoiety.They look down because OF HER APPROACH TO LIFE.Approach to life doesn't depend on education level of awareness or socio - economic status.
Originally posted by: anshurg5
When ppl belongs to marginalized section of society , their approach too becomes limited according to their situation , most of the times their aspirations and morale become limited to fulfilling their daily needs instead of thinking about the greater good of society or living a life adhering to high principles.Instead of looking down on these ppl and their approach , if ppl who are already enlightened and are intelligent enough spare their time to understand their situations and their fears, to make sincere efforts to widen their approach , they too may do better then many of these enlightened ppl.--------------------------If ppl go to vote for those who promises to take care of their needs then are they guilty of doing that and not thinking of greater good of society who hardly bother to think about them and improving their condition? why they are supposed to think beyond their daily needs when they are left with no other options?----------------------------------Today's episode have shown what a good person Mangla is . Though she has always stood to help others through her devi act like the woman whose husband was mistreating her, Kamli, Urmi , she easily overlooked those efforts and only thought of her devi acts when she was saving herself or Nandini and reprimanded herself for thinking about herself and Nandini alone.She wanted to do good for all and trying that too in her badly limited capacities but still cursing herself for not doing more. How many ppl are able to do that?Sincerely how many ppl who are even well situated , quite capable of helping others still not doing enough are able to reprimand themselves for not exerting themselves more?---------------------------If Nandini's mother could not think of keeping her children safe while doing good for others also then there is certainly problem with her strategy.If she wants to keep thinking about others at the cost of her own kids then it is her choice , why every one else who does not follow her foot steps need to be criticized?If she could not feel herself responsible for the welfare of the helpless child she brought in this world , then why every one needs to remain unconcerned for the welfare of her child?-------------------------If Mangla ever had the benefit of guidance of ppl like Sandyaji , support of ppl like Bhairon in her life ,she might have served the society in better way than Kishore or perhaps even Anandi.-------------------------It is mere arrogance that society is standing only because of few good ppl , in truth it is standing because most of it's ppl are good and do not give up their inherent goodness despite facing all sort of oppression from few bad and powerful ppl who are also part of this society.
Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
What about good samaritans who save lives? They will not break law if they dont save them. But they dont ask rights over persons who they saved.