Will you accept it?! DT NOTE PG 8 - Page 6

Originally posted by: libsrocks

Being equal is not always important. Both Gauri and Jagya were equal in pretty much every aspect and yet their marriage failed drastically. Whereas both Jagya-Ganga and Shiv-Anandi's marriage survived the social differences. Compatibility or understanding matters a lot and can bridge great differences. One can become equal to their partner even after marriage but before that they need establish relationship of respect and trust which AnSh clearly had for each other.

Shiv-Anandi's marriage had its own merits and demerits but in the end Anandi got to be with a partner like Shiv. She got to learn much more about life and even got the taste of what true love and relationship of marriage is about. No marriage is perfect so AnSh's marriage cannot be called unfavourable for Anandi or Shiv simply because of difference between social status or other aspects.

Originally posted by: Shinya

I was never in favor of Shiv-Anandi marriage because to me they never looked equals... At that time, anandi was nowhere near to shiv in anything.

They were poles apart in education, social status, marital status, and profession. He might have liked her because being a woman she was trying hard to develop the village.

He started respecting her when he came to know from Hethsingh that she was dumped by her husband, and slowly he fell in love with her.

Anant and Anandi can be said to be equals.

Originally posted by: Nandini30

You did not wanted shiv anandi marriage that is why you are in favour of this Anant
Wish shiv could have never married anandi he would have survived anandi seems to be a mangling
Whoever she married her marriage will not stay
And Anant anandi difference Anant is married once aji twice Anant s Pushpa is not open minded as anandi s ex Anant is ready to line Maro a lady in few days of divorce anandi took time Anant always blame Pushpa anandi never blamed Jagya yes financially Anant made money from ex father in law and anandi inherited money from in laws that both are opportunist no one

Originally posted by: anshurg5

In our system elected representatives are not considered lower that selected candidates. In fact these are elected candidates who make laws sitting in parliaments or assemblies . Job of selected candidates is to see that those laws are followed.

Elected candidates may loose power after a tenure but till the time they complete their tenure they are not considered less . As for re electing if a person is doing her/his job sincerely it can be expected that she can be selected for another tenure though it is not strictly true. Various other factors can also play a role there.

As CVs have shown that Anandi was a brilliant student , she could have also cleared IAS if she had attempted with proper preparation. I wished that Shiv would have chosen to inspire her to appear in that exam . It could have empowered her to do good for society.

Originally posted by: SPuja

@bold - Anandi was not elected representative that are empowered to make laws. She was merely a sarpanch of a village. Panchayat are just there to implement Government's welfare programme - the rules and regulations are made by selected officials.

Creatives just don't know anything about any profession - only family drama is their forte. That is why they did not show working of Panchayat properly. (I do not want to point out the glaring mistakes in those tracks (that was the best phase of Anandi's adult life - I liked her a lot - as sarpanch, as independent thinking woman (where she told Bhairo that she does not want to study medicine - it was so like taking her life in her own hands and not merely following what elderswant) and her adult education classes and thought she will be a real empowered woman) at that time I was a silent reader of the forum and I think at that time, forum did not scrutinize characters in minute details. But now after intense scrutiny of some side characters - even based on presumptions and assumptions - If I start discussing that - perhaps I will point out that creatives did a bad job.

**DT NOTE: Your comment has been removed because it included derogatory remarks against a character which is against IF COC.**

**DT NOTE: Your comment has been removed as it involved targeting other members of the forum and indirectly mocking them for having certain views regarding remarriages. This is against forum rules, therefore please avoid making such comments which other members will find insulting and that will lead to fights on the forum.**

Originally posted by: anshurg5