Originally posted by: Missesha
Singhs knew that Guari was insecured because of Anandi's status in J's / Singh's life. So when Anandi was not in picture anymore, then why couldn't they think of giving her a chance. The problem is that Singhs thought G was the only one who was at fault in all this and now that J has come back, he should never go back to her.
The problem lies with Singhs / Anandi accepting a break-up without question rather than making it as an opportunity to patch up between two people and guide them to reform together.
When two people were wrong, why one's wrong doing were overlooked, while another one's were counted.
Anandi is only brought in the discusion because she shouldered the responsbility of J's third marriage without ensuring that the second one closed well. Anandi is otherwise a fair person, hence the expectation.
All along G dd not seek forgiveness because J told her that he is leaving her for A. She didn't see the point of running after him again.
But only Singhs and J knew that he was not again married to Anandi. In that instance, why look for a third bride, when the second was LEFT by their son? Someone could have simply said, 'par Gauri kya?' That thought would have been enough to show humanity. But all were only concerned with ladesar's happiness and waris.
Only if J's first child had survived, would he have left G like that? or Would DSa not seek to close then? Just because G had nothing more to offer and since J was niether legally binded, they all walked off on her.