Bangles? Pl no - Page 2

Originally posted by: adi2512

A person like SRS IAS would not even had such a situation to encounter 😆

He would have explained the pro's and con's of his position, even before, the citizen had done something like that.

He can encounter such situations since he is in public service and citizens do come and vent out their frustration at them.😆 The person may have misunderstood or mistaken what SRS said or did.😆

Originally posted by: 5cents

Rohini, the act sure was very regressive. But I feel here it was used as an exaggerated threat😛

I guess there is a difference in how one perceives things too.

We women wear bangles for decorating our hands. It adds to the beauty of the hands that takes care and not that are helpless or weak. If I can use hands to put the bangles I sure can use it to remove them also when I desire and can go ahead & wring few necks😈

But I personally feel that it showed that courage is not the prerogative of the physically strong 😃 Hands wearing bangles can multitask if need arises we can remove/throw away the decoration and go ahead for destruction...Jai HO!!

It is a state of mind whether we wear or remove pants for saris or bangles for guns.

And it further showed that 8 to 80 can take on the baddie collector head on. 👍🏼

Basically it was over dramatized to drive a message home that women from Aji's Jaitser are not weak and meek. They are all are decedents of Jhansi ki rani. 😃

Some reality bites from Sanchi's maddern India ...After India's world cup defeat there was a pic in TOI of Sachin with lots of bangles next to him 😛

Originally posted by: adi2512

Tina...🤗

Loved your take on this ⭐️

Bang on post Rohini !

Uma & Appy i just read your post & yes never did it look like an endorsement... it was a spur of the moment decision not a planned act . I wouldn't loose my sleep on this rather if I had my way ...I would have told the girls to use the bangle as a arm-ammunition & attack . It did nothing to destroy our image. Women are physically weaker and man are stronger & on the other side men are emotionally weaker where we are stronger.

I don't understand why everybody is behind DS these days. Bechari accha karthi hai toh bhi usme galtiyan nikaalthe hai.

Originally posted by: 5cents

Uma & Appy i just read your post & yes never did it look like an endorsement... it was a spur of the moment decision not a planned act . I wouldn't loose my sleep on this rather if I had my way ...I would have told the girls to use the bangle as a arm-ammunition & attack . It did nothing to destroy our image. Women are physically weaker and man are stronger & on the other side men are emotionally weaker where we are stronger.

Rather I felt bad when Aji agreed to marry Shiv coz of pressure from her family members. We have had so many discussions here on that. But Aji is shown being happy and content in following her man 😉 I'm sure most of us here will not be happy with this 😛

where is Aji walking together with her hubby today? Though she has the capabilities. If Shiv would have encouraged her to prepare for civil services exams & all that would have been a different story.

BV is following the beaten path where things are changing but not drastically. THey still feel women's true happiness lies with her pati hence they just follow their man rather than walking together. its too hard for me to figure out why? Oh! Ya Pati parmeshwar 😉

Some of you have said the bangle scene was not an endorsement. It is certainly a point of view but had the cvs meant not to endorse they would have shown it in someway. Like one of the girls saying : "let's not demean ourselves by giving our bangles." Not Ds but one Anandi-type spunky girl. And DS rounding her eyes and saying in enlightened response : " chori tu sahi kahve." This way a regressive practice can be shown and debunked. And believe me the same forum would have gone ga-ga over the anandi effect on the jaitser girls.

Some others have said women who wear bangles are not weak and can also be aggressive when required. True. But then that would mean that the collector too can be strong. So i didn't quite get the logic.

I personally see the bangle as a handcuff -- strictly my view and am not judging others at all -- and have never worn them. Maybe the girls could have said : "wait till these bangles become handcuffs."
this where creative story- telling comes in.

Hats off to the way the cvs have shown DS in the same sequence. Her talking of environmental pollution was a class act. Shows her modern thinking. Which is why the bangle scene is jarring.