New Anandi..Look on the bright side - Page 4

Originally posted by: nniks

yeah all tht is fine but it wld hav been better if this was shown with someone who shared good chemistry with sid not toral who wld look as old as sumitra...not intrestrd in watching Shiv romancin his MIL

Originally posted by: Skepblun

@TM:

Great points and I agree! I hope the JaAn flashbacks won't happen again. I was fed up of them!

I am glad you made a positive topic. I think new Anandi is more suitable for maturity which needed to be portrayed by Anandi. She's around same age as Anandi the character is supposed to be. She'll be more suited and more comfortable playing a mother. I like her voice. Her dialogue delivery is better (unless she rushes it). And she is definitely more convincing in scenes required to show a bold or professional (social reformer) Anandi.

Finally, what's happened has happened.

@Others

Please! I don't mean to be some moral police but is this BV forum? What kind of words are being used for actors? I don't know how mods are allowing it and not warning members.

When Prats entered, people said she didn't look as young as Anandi should and that she looked like Gehna and of same age as Gehna (though Anandi's supposed to be younger). Even when J-A-G triangle started, many favoured Anjum and said she was more beautiful, more suited to Jagya and a better actress.

I am curious at members here (including spurt of "newbies"). When Sid had arrived, why were some bashing Prats in every new thread and calling her ugly or a dwarf who didn't suit Sid in any way?!!!

In recent months every time there's gadar on the forum and bashing of actors!!!

What's with this?! Now sudden love for Prats and so many insensitive adjectives, abuses and regressive trash hurled at Toral?

Show is about an issue and a character's journey. Not a jodi.

If Toral fits essence of Anandi then fine. That's the criteria IMO. Not whether she makes a good pair with Sid or not.

Even Sriti Jha looks older than Shashank! So what?

And why is it compulsory for a girl to look younger than a boy? Why is girl looking "older" than the boy considered problematic?! Funny we claim to live in modern times, yet have such regressive mindset! Odd that we lap up a 14 year old Avika with a 30+ actor as his wife, a 16 year old Prachi Desai with a 40 something Ram Kapoor as his wife, a 21 year old Neha Marda (Gehna) with a 40+ (or 50ish?) actor playing Basant, yet have problem if an actress is around same age as the actor or just 3-5 years younger! It is hypocrisy at best and misogyny!

The age comments are really unwarranted IMO.

Don't mind and don't take it personally, but I feel some people would've bashed even if Neha Bamb, Yashashri Masurkar, Sonarika or other younger, "innocent" faces had been chosen to play Anandi. Then some other reason to dislike would've come up. There's no limit to fault-finding

Originally posted by: Deeb

[/QUOTE

No matter what u say, unfortunately people will continue to bash the poor actress. People are forgetting that these actors/actresses are real people and we have no right to bash them based on their looks. Comment on their acting but not them personally. People r just sad... Very sad unfortunately.

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Even Sriti Jha looks older than Shashank! So what?

And why is it compulsory for a girl to look younger than a boy? Why is girl looking "older" than the boy considered problematic?! Funny we claim to live in modern times, yet have such regressive mindset! Odd that we lap up a 14 year old Avika with a 30+ actor as his wife, a 16 year old Prachi Desai with a 40 something Ram Kapoor as his wife, a 21 year old Neha Marda (Gehna) with a 40+ (or 50ish?) actor playing Basant, yet have problem if an actress is around same age as the actor or just 3-5 years younger! It is hypocrisy at best and misogyny!

The age comments are really unwarranted IMO.

Originally posted by: snowy80

in my veiw she looks much much older than sid