BV version of KBC

Lifeline Dadisa was a 'no go'. Bravo Dadisa. You have shown such integrity and honor despite the adage that 'you can't teach an old dog new tricks'.

Let's see if Lifeline Anandi pans out.

This guy still lacks sincerity. The pravachan at the end of today's episode was such hogwash. Jagya has still not acknowledged exclusively his part in his crime. He is still using Gauri as a scapegoat.

One part that struck out was when he said he broke relations with his family to establish a relationship with Gauri...now he has broken relations with Gauri to re-establish a relationship with his family. Nothing changes with him.

the flashback scenes he had of Anandi, only serves to further illustrate what a user he is.

Edit: update topic

but i must laud shashank for potraying it so convincingly that i hate him.

he was two timing two women who were clueless about his deciet.

anything gauri has done pales in contrast.

he wants to buy his way back into the family and into anandi's life , now that he realises that she was an angel he choose to break! henc ehe is putting entire blame on gauri ? thats simply unfair.

the trouble is i cannot stand him blaming gauri , even gauri was too good a match for him. it is his fault he lost his balls to a cool city girl, how an he blame anyoen else for his own weakness of character?

Parri,

Bhabhuti dialogues, shiv's clash with Jagya, then his raised eyebrow at Anandi's apparent silence, Jagya's still incomplete repentance and his continued blame evasion (Gauri, his latest 'alibi') and now Cm's bare poser to her; as all these indications go, Anandi may refuse to forgive him this time...

But, IMO, perhaps Anandi may forgive Jagadish in the end by default (unless Cvs are turning him in an outright negativity from his current grey cad personality). Not for his flash realisation or profuse apologies. But she herself may need to unload this past baggage once and for ever, before she starts afresh. Were she to continue unforgiving what may haunt her later? 1.) That she always maintained and recognised Jagya's own misfortune as a victim of an ill custom as a fact. 2.) she won't feel comfortable leaving her adopted family bared of their blood son, especially when now he is accepting a large part of his lapses towards them. 3.) She may also perceive a mother's deep anguish to see her living son permanently asunder, however disowning she might be to him on principle, especially when they have been so fair to her. 4.) in the end her friendship bond may still prevail on her on at least friendship level...again IMO.

In bet'n, a power pack performance by Surakhaji today. She is a treasure.

Well i thought of KBC because of the way in which Jagya was going about obtaining forgiveness. First Dadisa, then Anandi...what next...Nandu?

His method is so impure. He is trying to emotionally blackmail them into forgiving him. Fact is, he is still very much selfabsorbed. Looking at his gain. Why can't he sacrifice his repentance for Anandi's happiness? Why not go away from there quietly.?

Yes, this imparts a hollowness to his efforts. The character is continued being written in an explicitly self absorbed mode. But then a touch of sincerity, even if only for a moment- and though in reference to another messed up relationship- was displayed by the director/ writer. I refer to his submission to his father- his failure as a son. Though dialogues where rhetoric, more touching was an effective use of background male voice alaap, as if a plea for help was silently being sent by a son to his Parent, however undeserving the son was. There was a fleeting moment of a sadness on both faces; not only on a son consciously proud of his father whom he had foolishly abjured and lost, but also on the father, who had long since given up on this errant son. Both Shashank and Anup Soni were subtle in this scene.

Then coming to another lacuna on writer's part, I can't help but notice how circumnavigating they are on Dsa's role as original contributor. Yes, Surekhji bowled us over with her outstanding performance. Yes, in context of Jagya's ill-fated adult decisions and her own reshaped/reformed outlook/world view,she was every bit right, apt and necessary in spelling out her family's chief objection to her grandson's reckless misstep. But when she says, "why you never thought how you are ruining the life of an innocent person", should she not lament an exactly similar ruin to the same girl contemplated and insisted to be carried out by her own erring judgement a few years ago. Though, she was saved from this sin by default, are not repercussions still reverberating all around? IMO.