cv's do not create fake information about india - Page 2

1. Akbarnama by Abul Fazl

2. Ain-e-Akbari by Abul Fazl

written during his lifetime by his court historian and biographer,abul fazl.

we r taught distorted history written by britishers...so there are many facts which are kept hidden .

for more information on akbar read this article, which is based on the above mentioned books.

in hindi

http://agniveer.com/akbar-great-hi/

in english

Originally posted by: CeruleanSky

Well, you might have your sources but I've read differently - there are several Indian historians, specially those who belong to the materialist school of historiography - like Romila Thapar, DD Kosambi, etc - who write that this was not so. While the concept of having an age of marriage is definitely old, its only relatively recently that eighteen has been fixed as that age, with the legislations passed during British rule. Even during the Vedic period, which itself spanned a millenium, daughters used to be married 'young' - but there they had a greater degree of freedom than what they had later, when organized Brahmanical religion took over. I'm pretty sure it's sociological factors which contributed to child marriage, whenever this institution was born - and not because of 'Muslim invasions'...and like someone else has pointed out, the religion of those invaders had nothing to do with the invasions - they were Turks, or Moguls, or Afghans. They didn't rape women because of a particular religion - religion has no relevance here, in my opinion. So calling them Muslim invaders is wrong itself, in my opinion...just because certain British writers dubbed periods in our history as 'Hindu', and 'Muslim', we too fall prey to those very fallacies even today. Muslim communities had been living in India long before warriors from the Central Asian empires rode in- the Arab merchants who took up residence in the Malabar coast, etc.

Source: History course in first year of law school.

Originally posted by: surabhi01

child marriage hoti thi pur ladkiyon pur koi bandish nahi thi .purane jamane mein shaadi isliye ki jaati thi kyonki hindu mein dharam ka palan patni ke bina nahi ho sakta tha us time parda pratha jaise koi kupratha bhi nahi thi .pur middle age mein parda pratha shuru ho gayi aur un pur bevajah bandishe shuru ho gayin

Originally posted by: sayali_babes

@TM:
I'm with you. I didn't get why people started criticizing you. What you stated is an irrefutable fact.

1. does it not happen in india - it does
2. does it happen only in muslims- no
3. do hindus also do so even now- yes
4. fine started by muslim invasions was adopted and continued till now so does that mean it is ok?- no
5. are familes not doing it coz started by muslims? -no they are doing it irrespective of it!!

then how is fake info that is being spread? i feel it is just diluting the message spread by cvs

Originally posted by: monny

plz avoid discussions on religion...