I have really, really loved shivraj shekhar's entry and am equally heart thumping about his impending marriage to anandi.
That being said, I find dadisa's approach to splitting up ashi and shiv a little disconcerting considering she has already seen the havoc that gauri wreaked in jagya and anandi's life.
Dadisa said "Lapundari should go back to london and find a lapundara for herself, this collector is only for my anandi"
Funny as all the dialogues may be, and comedic as the situation and dadisa's actions may be, it bothers me to a point of serious irritation.
If the lapundari is indeed for the collector and the collector feels the same way (which they have not shown till now that it is only ashi's one-sided love, we only get the same hint from his vague avoidance of marriage talk ... but dadisa has not been privy to it) ... is it right then for dadisa to start plotting about breaking them up? How is dadisa any better than gauri or her mom?
bhairon, sumitra and dadisa have all told gauri that "kisi ke aansuo se seencha hua rishta kabhi khushi nahin deta" (a relationship sown with someone else's tears can never bring happiness to you) ...
I feel that if anandi and shiv get married on a foundation of ashi's tears then that too will not be a happy or healthy relationship.
It is one thing if ashi and shiv break up on their own, or shiv declares there is no relationship, and then dadisa gets into action mode to hook up anandi... but for dadisa to actively plot to send the lapundari back to London to find her own lapundara didnt sit well with me...