Adultery vs Love - Page 2

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Really? The sindoor scene? Or was that just his ego telling him he owned Anandi and could do anything with her. Which husband duty did he fulfill? Consummation? More out of havas than anything I feel. Within two months he forgot all husband duty by romancing another girl😆

yes I meant only husband duty of SR and Honeymoon which he did after adulthood, but u start replying without reading and understanding the full post as soon u find anything to hit back. Wht I further written, tht after tht duties HE WAS BOUND TO FULFILL ALL HIS DUTY AND NOT DO TAK JHAK HERE AND THERE. 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by: Suchi-Virmanian

SRK , I hope you understand ANKIT is being sarcastic! Those who hate gauri , hate jagya even more.

So if you think ANkit or anyone in the forum is a gauri hater then by default, consider them to hate jagya.

Arey suchi, SRk find very rarely to hit back me, for which she always in search of. So as soon she find anything she start without reading and understanding fully 😆 😆

I think law against adultery sd be more harder thn current one, becoz its mental raping of a wife. I m not hypocrite to claim tht I hate this things but I oppose the law against it. I hate rapist and want harder law and stronger punishment thn it is. I hate terrorist and want fast track court and punish thm severely. Same way I hate adultery and want a stronger law against, so tht no one go Scott free by mentally tourchering their partners in the name of personal matter or TRUE LOVE. they sd be punished and punished severely.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

If you go into an arranged marriage firstly you go into it as a consenting adult! You understand the full meaning the full implications of marriage. You are able to understand those saat pheres and saat vachans you make. Is any of this possible being married as an 8 year old? This is why I reckon the Government has made that law that within two years after becoming legal child marriage victims are allowed to break their marriage.I don't think Jagiya didn't understand the implication of marriage at 18, especially when all his friends were married. He consummated his marriage. Anandi was not a stranger to him. She had lived with him as a kid and for 5 years they lived apart they were in contact. He could have rethought his marriage in those 5 years. They had a loving relationship at the start.Love is an emotion that just comes - however selfless and good your partner may be it doesnt mean that you will automatically love them. If you have chosen this marriage willingly then that means that you have chosen to fulfill it till your last breath. If it is a child marriage you should have a right to find your own choice, provided you do it with full dignity.

I have to argue against your idea that Jagiya didn't love Anandi. It was Gauri who made advances towards him. I am sure if Anandi was educated jagiya wouldn't have left her. He just left her because she was uneducated villager. Anandi and Jagya were not friends but husband and wife. It may be easy to leave friendship but marriage. I can agree if it was child marriage, but it was a marriage consummated after adulthood. both the parties were sensible enough to know what they were doing.

I am sorry I will never leave my partner if he has done so much for me. I have to be heartless and self-centred. Use other person and throw them. Jagiya should have respected it.

So basically if you choose to marry then you must fulfill your vachans - unless of course in drastic cases. But even I am not a supporter of divorce except when absolutely necessary. In Jogia's case I supported him when he said he truly loved Gauri because I didn't think he needed to be bound by a marriage he never did in the true sense and that time of course I thought it to be llegal. I just feel the way Jogia went about it was totally wrong. Now however I doubt the very context of his love🤢 Cos he is a big liar!

Are you doubting his love? And so the logic of Jagiya-Gauri marriage?

Originally posted by: ankit111

I just hate people who justify their adultery in the name of TRUE LOVE. This is insulting the word LOVE. I support divorce only if their is problem in incompatibility between husband and wife. Their nature is different and they can't adjust with each other and their is no possibilities of adjustment. But only becoz u found another one better thn old one and u want to update it in the name of True love, without thinking abt the other concerned party, tht is ur wife, its morally wrong. Thn their is no need of marriage system itself. In Jogia case, he was fully comfortable with Anandi and his so called thought against BV, never came in his mind, even in adulthood. They were ideal pair till he left for Mumbai and started his adventure. How can be his love to Gouri can be a TRUE LOVE, which was based on lie. I never support such love adventure and ditching a wife, who even saved it life. Who never go against ur wish and always supported u. This is simple a.case of adultery and it sd be condemned in hardest way.

i have no energy left to argue over jagiya and gauri scenario ...