Originally posted by: sudss
tinoo... really nice thing tht u did! so sweet of u...
i dint understand how its related to ur watching BV though.. but that was a real nice gesture... lil deeds of kindness, lil words of love... makeour earth an Eden like the heaven above 😊 this is for u 🤗
Hi sudss --
its the importance of a verbal commitment that I realized from balika vadhu is what i meant -- to the extent that if i have given my word, then I will still drive three hours to communicate my inability to manage my word - to let the other person know that our original agreement is not on.
Both parties need to know if the original protocol agreed upon, will not be upheld. It cannot be a unilateral abdication of responsibilities -- the other side also needs to know.
I sort of did this when it was easy -- to just pick up a phone and call someone, or send an email, but when it was hard -- I just let it slide. I would never have driven three hours to tell someone I dont want to buy something I committed to -- particularly if I dont have to see that person again and there is no legal obligation that would inflict penalties if I break it. .
Jagya did not inform anandi that he was not happy with her, which was the honest way to do it and the respectful way to break off the relationship. He did not see the need to do this because there was no legal documentation of the marriage -- and in any case, his child marriage was illegal anyway (acc to him and viewers too did not know about the marriage turning valid after two years). which is fine.
But even if there was no legal divorce required ... he still had an obligation to understand that she still considered herself his wife in a societal way ... and he should have obtained the "spiritual divorce" which is a clear breaking off the commitment. Here because there were no legal penalties, jagya did not feel it necessary to communicate anything.
i guess it hit me in a different way when I saw the J-G marriage and the way he handled anandi --
and so atleast for me, it was the easiest thing to have let my commitment with the woman slide.
It was only a verbal contract, she didnt know my name even, I would probably not see this woman again for another year or so, because I dont go to that locality where her shop is located often at all. There were no penalties that she could inflict on me because there was no proof. And such a small shop tucked away in a gully somewhere.
In earlier times, I would have just considered it too much to drive three hours only to tell her I wouldnt buy it -- I would most certainly have driven three hours only to buy it.
I would have let it slide because i didnt have the higher level of integrity and would just assume that at one point she would move it out of her store room back into the racks.
But I think Balika vadhu has sort of sharpened my focus on the small things and managing my word. 😃😃 . So even though legal divorce was not necessary, I did take a "spiritual divorce" from the shawl. 😆😆😆😆
We live, we learn.
I was reading about integrity on the internet -- and movie star tom hanks has three pieces of advice for anyone hoping to advance in life "Tell the truth. Tell the truth. Tell the truth"
He had a similar example, he found out once that a store clerk had given him $ 10 extra change.
He went all the way across town to return it (thereby putting him out more than the $10), just so the store clerk would not have to reimburse the owner $10 from his own pocket.
He could have let it slide -- and $10 was such a small amount and he was such a big movie star -- but he still returned because that was part of his personal truth and gave back the extra $10 so that the store clerk would not have to pay $10 from his own pocket.
I think what I'm doing is flexing my "integrity muscles" a lot more nowadays, and I give credit to Balika vadhu for bringing the import of lying and truth into such sharp focus.