If gauri were pregnant - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

2.6k

Users

11

Likes

28

Frequent Posters

shreela thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#11
as far as I know, a child from a void marriage can claim rights on the property of his parents only, and no one else. so Gauri's child may claim rights on Jagat's property(jo hai hi nehi😛), but not Singh family's.
sreevask thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: shreela

as far as I know, a child from a void marriage can claim rights on the property of his parents only, and no one else. so Gauri's child may claim rights on Jagat's property(jo hai hi nehi😛), but not Singh family's.


U R ri8! G's children can claim ancestral property (if there's any) and all the properties of J(again if there's any)
455325 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: sreevask


Gouri has no rights as a legal wife but her children DO have all the legal rights as per the Law!


Unless they leap and show the kid 25 yrs from now fighting for it's right I hardly envisage ds sending a baby hamper to all or one of jagats kids born out of wedlock. Let alone signing off her property.
-Purva- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Engager Level 4 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 14 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: tinoo

Let us say Jagya and Guari turned up with a baby or gauri came when she was 7 months pregnant to the haveli -- Dadisa would have turned all the property over to the parpotha. She has absolutely no standards/values she stands upon. So really, all this nautanki of keeping J in the haveli for reasons of bringing him back to A is just bogus. It was her own swaarth for J that she told them to stay back and she should be decent enough to take a stand that she liked J and wanted her to stay regardless of what he had done to anandi.



If Gauri does have a child, Dadisa will insist that the child be given to Anandi for rearing under Dadisa's supervision and Gauri should have no contact with the child only then will the child have any rights over the property.

Gauri will scream and shout and create scenes and accuse Anandi of trying to steal her child when she could not regain Jagya's love, but ultimately being the selfish people they are Gauri and Jagya will give away their child to Anandi and Dadisa.


Legally all the property belongs to Dadisa and Basanth and Bhairon. Basanth and Bhairon have already disinherited Jagya and also his children if he has any from the union with Gauri. That leaves only Dadisa, if she dies without a will, then only the property that is not already distributed to the other heirs will become family property. In that property equal share has to be given to Basanth, Bhairon, Nandu, Suguna, Suguna's son, Suguna's daughter, Jagya and Jagya's children if he has any. Dadisa has already distributed all her jewelry and business interest in her lifetime, which leaves only the haveli with so many claimants. If all other claimants are living in the haveli, at best Jagya and his children can ask for a room, and other residents have to give them that share - which could be the cowshed or even the outhouse where Suguna had to stay. The non-resident claimants can have no say in the choice of room.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".